2015
DOI: 10.1002/joc.4303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impacts of long‐lived jet contrail ‘outbreaks’ on surface station diurnal temperature range

Abstract: Multiple persistent jet aviation contrails -contrail 'outbreaks' -occur frequently over certain portions of the Continental United States (CONUS). The artificial cloudiness generated by contrail outbreaks alters the atmospheric radiation budget, potentially impacting the surface air temperature, particularly the diurnal temperature range (DTR), or difference between daytime maximum and nighttime minimum temperatures. This study evaluates the hypothesis that contrail outbreaks reduce the DTR relative to clear-s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the grounding period had a 1.8°C larger range than the adjacent 3-day intervals, and Travis et al (2002) concluded that mean DTR across the United States increased during the grounding period due to the absence of contrails. A more recent study using meteorological sites with similar characteristics but differing contrail coverage also suggested that contrails reduce DTR (Bernhardt & Carleton, 2015), supporting the earlier results (Travis et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Additionally, the grounding period had a 1.8°C larger range than the adjacent 3-day intervals, and Travis et al (2002) concluded that mean DTR across the United States increased during the grounding period due to the absence of contrails. A more recent study using meteorological sites with similar characteristics but differing contrail coverage also suggested that contrails reduce DTR (Bernhardt & Carleton, 2015), supporting the earlier results (Travis et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%