2000
DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2000.9967009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impetus for organisational change: An exploration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They 'seek to avoid dependencies and external control and, at the same time, to shape their own contexts and retain their autonomy for independent action' (Pfeffer and Salancik, 2003, 261). Higher education researchers also found that universities have 'room to manoeuvre' in the process of adapting to the external environments (El-Khawas, 2000;Kogan and Hanney, 2000;Reed et al, 2002;Maassen and Stensaker, 2003;Stensaker, 2006). Strategic planning that focuses only on external threats and challenges is largely unsuccessful in higher education (Chaffee, 1983;Keller, 1997;Birnbaum, 2000), while those considering internal factors are more successful (Rowan, 2006;Shin, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…They 'seek to avoid dependencies and external control and, at the same time, to shape their own contexts and retain their autonomy for independent action' (Pfeffer and Salancik, 2003, 261). Higher education researchers also found that universities have 'room to manoeuvre' in the process of adapting to the external environments (El-Khawas, 2000;Kogan and Hanney, 2000;Reed et al, 2002;Maassen and Stensaker, 2003;Stensaker, 2006). Strategic planning that focuses only on external threats and challenges is largely unsuccessful in higher education (Chaffee, 1983;Keller, 1997;Birnbaum, 2000), while those considering internal factors are more successful (Rowan, 2006;Shin, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As previously anticipated, various triggerswhich are located either within or outside the organizational boundariesare able to enact structural and procedural processes of change in educational institutions. On the one hand, internal agents, such as top and middle-line managers, have been argued to be crucial initiators of change dynamics (El-Khawas, 2000), in fact, they oversee and handle the interdependencies between the organization and the external environment, performing as catalysts of change events whichin general termsare intended to: improve the functioning of educational institutions, tackle unexpected organizational shocks and deal with abrupt management challenges (van Loon, 2001). On the other hand, external pressures have the potential to prompt a redesign of traditional schemes and practices rooted in educational organizations.…”
Section: Research Findings 31 the Triggers Of Change In Educational Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%