The Implementation of Multiple Intelligence in (Science) Classroom: From Empirical Into Critical

Abstract

Abstract. Many educational researches have been done in the Multiple Intelligence (MI) perspective, both in quantitative and qualitative, and even action research. All of them offered a positive contribution to educational view. However, many researches have also found weaknesses that still need improvement both in terms of accuracy of the basic theory based on Gardner's theory, methodologies, instruments, as well as an understanding of MI theory itself. This study is part of the literature study with resources from some relevant references, authors' knowledge, observation results, and authors' experiences. Therefore, this paper describes how MI theory was used in the previous study, analyzed, and even criticized, as well as the perception of the authors. In bare, this paper analyzes some empirical studies in Multiple Intelligence, the interpretive perspective, MI in critical view, and the own-personal view about MI theory. In addition, the authors depict the lesson from implementation of the theory in school (Taiwan) in terms of compliance with the criteria of intelligence. The implementation MI theory in science domain is also exemplified.

Indonesian Curriculum Reform in Policy and Local Wisdom: Perspectives from Science Education

“…This study utilized Khan's research and the writers' previous research method. The step comprises of five headings: "framing problems for a review, identifying relevant work, assessing the quality of studies, summarizing the evidence, and interpreting the findings" (Khan et al, 2003;Suprapto & Pai, 2015;Suprapto, 2016;Suprapto et al, 2017). Meanwhile, in creating an outline, there are five essential issues: (1) introducing our topic with some basic background in-formation; (2) introducing possible objections to our position; (3) supporting and acknowledging the opposing points; (4) explaining that our position is still the best one, despite the strength of counter-arguments; and (5) summarizing our argument and restating our position (Fleming, 2020).…”

The Pros and Cons of the “New Normal” Concept during COVID-19 Outbreak

“…The previous researcher used the term a conceptual analysis (see Razzak, 2020). A position paper attempts to reassure the reader that our perspective is accurate and defensible (Abidah et al, 2020;Suprapto, 2016;Suprapto et al, 2017). Generally, the steps in writing a position paper included: "(1) Select a topic for our paper; (2) Conduct preliminary research; (3) Challenge our topic; (4) Continue to collect supporting evidence; and (5) Create an outline" (Belliappa, 2020;Fleming, 2020).…”

A systematic review of photovoice as participatory action research strategies

“…Figure 2 illustrates the schematic procedure of a systematic review of research. The systematic review process follows the direction of previous researchers [34][35][36]. The first steps are determining, creating, and defining the topic or idea that will be used to review the focus of the research.…”