The Implications of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) for Social Support Message Processing and Outcomes: When and Why Are the Effects of Support Messages Strengthened During CMC?

Abstract

Widespread use of computer‐mediated communication (CMC) for exchanging social support has raised questions about the support‐related implications of CMC. This study drew from the dual‐process theory of supportive message outcomes and examined the implications of CMC for support message processing and outcomes. We hypothesized that the reduced social cues in CMC would encourage greater elaboration on support message content and lead support messages to have a greater impact than in face‐to‐face interaction. The results of the experiment showed that, although the support message was held constant, participants in the CMC condition reported the strongest motivation to receive support, engaged in the greatest level of message elaboration, and experienced the most beneficial changes in worry and uncertainty discrepancy.

The Stuff That Verbal Person-Centered Support Is Made of: Identifying Linguistic Markers of More and Less Supportive Conversations

“…As identified by Niederhoffer and Pennebaker (2002), people who focus on their feelings about stressful events in ways that help them make sense of these events experience more positive health outcomes than those who write simple narrative descriptions. Similar effects also have been found for online communication (Rains, Brunner, Akers, Pavlich, & Tsetsi, 2016) and in supportive conversations (Cannava & Bodie, 2017;Jones & Wirtz, 2006).…”

The Neurobehavioral Mechanisms Underlying Attitudes Toward People With Mental or Physical Illness

“…Supportive messages were employed as a representative form of prosocial behavior, since they are a simple way of showing support and concern and, despite their concise form, can have meaningful positive effects on the listener (Coulson et al, 2007 ; Rains et al, 2016 ). A total of 48 messages with a rating score over four points (anchored by “1 = definitely not encouraged” and “7 = definitely encouraged”) were selected from a previously conducted behavioral pilot study ( n = 56).…”

Focusing on the “Public” in Public Relations: The Importance of Person-Centered Messages (PCMs) in Crisis Communication on Twitter

“…One way in which this can be implemented is through crafting messages that are tailored to the crisis event and relevant publics. Unfortunately, few practical guidelines currently exist for crisis communication practitioners when responding to crisis events that unfold online (Rains et al, 2016). Practitioners may gain insight for these messages by turning to the supportive communication literature (e.g., Jones & Bodie, 2014) that examines comforting communication.…”