1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1981.tb00551.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implications of differential rates of capital gain from owner occupation for the formation and development of housing classes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When regional prices differ widely there is a fear that mobility between regions may be made very difficult (Thorns, 1981). This is also true at the subregional level, where low absolute prices or low rates of capital accumulation have led to the situation where poor owner occupiers become trapped in inadequate housing, which may be declining in value (Karn, 1979;Karn et al, 1985).…”
Section: House Prices In Urban Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When regional prices differ widely there is a fear that mobility between regions may be made very difficult (Thorns, 1981). This is also true at the subregional level, where low absolute prices or low rates of capital accumulation have led to the situation where poor owner occupiers become trapped in inadequate housing, which may be declining in value (Karn, 1979;Karn et al, 1985).…”
Section: House Prices In Urban Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In light of the debate about interregional disparities it is important to explain the Glasgow experience as it diverges from the national picture and from the pattern predicted by previous writers, especially Thorns (1982Thorns ( , 1981.…”
Section: House Price Trends In Glasgowmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proletarian owner occupation offers the potential for new petty-bourgeois class formation, through the capital gains of outright owner occupiers (Pratt, 1982;Thorns, 1981b), but in Britain, this potential remains largely unrealised. In contrast, bourgeois owner occupation opens up real opportunities for the advancement of the bourgeoisie as a class, and not just in Britain (Edel, 1982;Thorns 1981a). What Forrest and Murie (1986) have described as the increasing 'social differentiation' (p48) within owner occupation is therefore a differentiation along essentially class lines.…”
Section: The Nature Of Social Classmentioning
confidence: 99%