2004
DOI: 10.1080/00128775.2004.11041069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Implications of Foreign Direct Investment for Development in Transition Countries: Challenges for the Croatian Economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is true that much of the FDI that has come into transition economies has been used to purchase existing firms rather than to finance new greenfield investments. Nevertheless, even FDI through mergers and acquisitions has a positive effect on domestic capital formation (Šohinger and Harrison, 2004) because investors do contribute additional capitalization to their acquisitions. Moreover, as Hunya (1996) shows in the case of Hungary, foreign firms have higher profits and reinvest a much higher share of it than do domestically‐owned firms, thus increasing capital formation in the future.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is true that much of the FDI that has come into transition economies has been used to purchase existing firms rather than to finance new greenfield investments. Nevertheless, even FDI through mergers and acquisitions has a positive effect on domestic capital formation (Šohinger and Harrison, 2004) because investors do contribute additional capitalization to their acquisitions. Moreover, as Hunya (1996) shows in the case of Hungary, foreign firms have higher profits and reinvest a much higher share of it than do domestically‐owned firms, thus increasing capital formation in the future.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies, such as those by Makki and Somwaru (2004) and Nair-Reichert and Weinhold (2001), find a causal relation that runs from FDI and trade to economic growth in large samples of developing countries. A host of country case studies also suggest a positive effect of FDI on growth, such as those by Sohinger and Harrison (2004) and Walkenhorst (2004). Many other studies of non-MENA countries examine the effect of FDI on economic growth, such as those by Altomonte and Guagliano (2003), Andreff (2002), Bhaumik and Gelb (2005), Damijan et al (2003), Frenkel et al (2004), Grogan and Moers (2001), Li et al (2001), and Rutkowski (2006 Supported by the growing empirical evidence that asserts a positive contribution of FDI on exports and growth, perspectives on FDI have shifted toward greater accommodation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Much of the FDI that came into transition economies has been used to purchase existing firms rather than to finance new Greenfield investments (Brada et al, 2006); however, even FDI used for mergers and acquisitions has a positive effect on domestic capital formation (Šohinger and Harrison, 2004) because investors do contribute additional capital to their acquisitions. Moreover, as Hunya (1996) shows in the case of Hungary, foreign firms have higher profits and reinvest a much higher share of it than do domestically owned firms, thus increasing capital formation in the future.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%