“…This instrument quantifies the strength of associations between concepts by comparing response latencies when people categorize stimuli (Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998). The IAT is also the implicit measure that has been used most frequently to study religious cognition (Jong et al, 2017), and at least eight studies have adapted the IAT to measure supernatural belief (Dentale et al, 2018;Farias et al, 2017;Irwin, 2014;Jong et al, 2012;Lindeman, Svedholm-Hakkinen, & Riekki, 2016;Shariff, Cohen, & Norenzayan, 2008;Testoni, Visintin, Capozza, Carucci, & Shams, 2016;Turpin, Andersen, & Lanman, 2018). 1 For example, using a "single target" variant of the IAT (Bluemke & Friese, 2007;Wigboldus, Holland, & van Knippenberg, 2006), Shariff et al (2008) found that the strength of the association between supernatural entities (e.g., god, devil, heaven) and terms associated with "truth" (e.g., actual, genuine, real) was positively associated with self-reported religiosity measures, especially the item "I believe in God".…”