The implicit power motive in intergroup dialogues about the history of slavery.

Abstract

This research demonstrates that individual differences in the implicit power motive (i.e., the concern with impact, influence, and control) moderate how African Americans communicate with White Americans in challenging intergroup dialogues. In a study with African American participants we find that the higher their implicit power motive, the more they use an affiliation strategy to communicate with a White American partner in a conversation context that evokes the history of slavery (Study 1). In a study with White American participants we find that, in the same conversation context, they are more engaged (i.e., open, attentive, and motivated) if they receive an affiliation message rather than a no-affiliation message from an African American partner (Study 2). In interracial dyads we find that African American participants' implicit power motives moderate how much they intend to signal warmth to a White American discussion partner, how much they display immediacy behaviors and use affiliation imagery in the discussion, and with what level of engagement White American participants respond (Study 3). High but not low implicit power African Americans thus employ a communication strategy-expressing affiliation and warmth-that can be effective for engaging White Americans with uncomfortable, race-identity-relevant topics. (PsycINFO Database Record

A Needs-Based Support for #MeToo: Power and Morality Needs Shape Women’s and Men’s Support of the Campaign

“…Moreover, the negative association between women's view of the campaign as an opportunity for moral improvement and support for the campaign implies that at least some women have a preference for less confrontational campaigns (e.g., as they believe that women too should improve their moral conduct). Such campaigns against sexual harassment could mobilize men and women by emphasizing shared ideals and values rather than intergroup differences (for a similar strategy in the context of racial relations in the United States see Ditlmann et al, 2017). In conclusion, the insights gained through our findings promote a deeper understanding of the factors that facilitate men's and women's support for the struggle against sexual harassment, and allow to identify strategies to remove the psychological obstacles that hinder such support.…”

“…Moreover, the finding that men's moral reputation concerns are associated with opposition to the campaign implies that men's defensiveness and consequent opposition can be reduced through the affirmation of their ingroup's morality, for example, by highlighting that harassment is not a typical male behavior as most men treat women with respect. Similar moral affirmation strategies were found to be effective in increasing White Americans' willingness to address grievances of Black Americans (Ditlmann et al, 2017). In the context of gender relations, the positive portrayal of feminist men increased men's solidarity with women that in turn translated into collective action intentions (Wiley et al, 2013).…”

Needs satisfaction in intergroup contact: A multi-national study of pathways toward social change

“…Rather, we would argue that these results may suggest that it may be best for disadvantaged group members to make advantaged group members feel accepted while also bringing up social injustices (for the effective use of this strategy by African Americans, see Ditlmann et al, 2017). While we did not preregister a hypothesis regarding the effect of perceived illegitimacy on support for social change, this direct effect was clearly and robustly positive in all four studies.…”

“…As for advantaged group members, although intergroup contact with the disadvantaged is positively associated with their support for social change (Hässler et al, 2020), this effect might fail to fully materialize under certain conditions. For example, when advantaged group members' need for acceptance remains unsatisfied, they may disengage from the outgroup (Ditlmann et al, 2017). It is therefore important to establish what type of intergroup contact (empowering vs. accepting) is most likely to augment support for change toward equality among which groups (disadvantaged vs. advantaged).…”

The implicit power motive predicts decisions in line with perceived instrumentality

“…Recent studies on inter-group interactions resonate well with this idea. In these studies (Ditlmann et al 2017 ), African-American participants wrote a letter to a bogus White American, in which they were asked to discuss the “history of slavery and its implications for intergroup relations today” (p. 120). As a dependent measure, researchers studied the content of these letters.…”