1988
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/13.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of central noradrenergic influences on the olfactory bulb in the processing of learned olfactory cues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase in noradrenaline in response to muscimol challenges has also been reported in the sheep main olfactory bulb [14] and is probably due to the action of the GABA A receptor agonist on the noradrenergic presynaptic terminals [4]. Therefore, such local control of noradrenaline release by activation of GABA A receptors is probably important for enhancing the release of noradrenaline in the vicinity of the AOB mitral cells responding to male pheromones and thereby leading to the formation of the pheromone-specific memory as previously suggested [5]. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that bicuculline-induced memory lacks the pheromone specificity of the memory formed at mating and appears to generalize to the pheromones of at least one other strain [11].…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…An increase in noradrenaline in response to muscimol challenges has also been reported in the sheep main olfactory bulb [14] and is probably due to the action of the GABA A receptor agonist on the noradrenergic presynaptic terminals [4]. Therefore, such local control of noradrenaline release by activation of GABA A receptors is probably important for enhancing the release of noradrenaline in the vicinity of the AOB mitral cells responding to male pheromones and thereby leading to the formation of the pheromone-specific memory as previously suggested [5]. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that bicuculline-induced memory lacks the pheromone specificity of the memory formed at mating and appears to generalize to the pheromones of at least one other strain [11].…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Evidence-in particular, that of Walter Freeman and his coworkers-indicates that, with repeated reinforced exposure, odor-specific bursts of neural activity are produced from the surface of the olfactory bulb (see, e.g., Carmi & Leon, 1991;Chaput & Holley, 1985;Coop-ersmith & Leon, 1984;Freeman & Grajski, 1987;Grajski & Freeman, 1986, 1989Sullivan, Wilson, & Leon, 1989). Furthermore, learning has been shown to produce odorrelated synaptic changes in both the bulb (Gervais, Holley, & Keverne, 1988;Grajski & Freeman, 1989;Gray, Freeman, & Skinner, 1986;Nicoll & Jahr, 1982;Sullivan et aI., 1989;Wilson & Sullivan, 1991) and olfactory cortex (Haberly & Bower, 1989;Kauer, 1987;Schild, 1988). It is possible, therefore, that, through learning and association, these changes are the basis on which object odors come to be recognized as single entities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mammalian olfactory systems the necessity of modulatory input from outside the olfactory bulb for behavioral modification of olfactory bulb electrophysiology is well documented (Gervais et al 1988;Gray et al 1986). We have shown that the coherent network oscillation in LFP displayed by the PC is modulated in frequency and waveform by dopamine and serotonin .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%