2016
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.02633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of factors controlling species abundance and distribution varies in native and non‐native ranges

Abstract: How variation in factors controlling species abundance and distribution between native and non‐native ranges compares to that within ranges remains poorly understood. We used a globally distributed ruderal, Centaurea solstitialis (Centaurea), to explore the possibility that the importance of those factors exhibits great variation between and within ranges. To test our hypothesis, we established seed addition experiments with soil disturbance (turnover and control) and biocide (fungicides, insecticide, and cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(123 reference statements)
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trait divergence may be a result of related (and neighboring) plants associating with divergent AMF communities Veresoglou & Rillig, 2014) These divergent responses likely contributed to the lack of differences between invasive and other taxa. These findings support the hypothesis that a multitude of factors (e.g., anthropogenic disturbance, plantmicrobe interactions, traits) contribute to invasiveness (Hierro et al, 2016;e.g., Maron et al, 2013;Müller, Horstmeyer, Rönneburg, van Kleunen, & Dawson, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Trait divergence may be a result of related (and neighboring) plants associating with divergent AMF communities Veresoglou & Rillig, 2014) These divergent responses likely contributed to the lack of differences between invasive and other taxa. These findings support the hypothesis that a multitude of factors (e.g., anthropogenic disturbance, plantmicrobe interactions, traits) contribute to invasiveness (Hierro et al, 2016;e.g., Maron et al, 2013;Müller, Horstmeyer, Rönneburg, van Kleunen, & Dawson, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Fewer studies have examined the effect of resilience on invasions (e.g., Hierro et al. ), but our results demonstrated that the more resilient system, the one that recovered to its pre‐disturbance cover state more quickly, was more resistant to invasion, consistent with Prediction 4 of FRH. Collectively, these findings support the premise that invasibility is an emergent community property, not well predicted by diversity or productivity alone in natural systems (Stohlgren et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We sampled microbial communities associated with leaves (phyllosphere and endosphere) and roots (ectorhizosphere and endorhizosphere) of yellow starthistle plants in both the California invasion and native regions in Europe. Previous experiments with fungicide treatments have shown that plant-soil interactions between yellow starthistle and fungi in California are more negative (less favorable) than those in the native range, inconsistent with a role for fungi in beneficial species interactions in this invasion (45). Here, we focus on documenting the variation in bacterial communities, using high-throughput sequencing of ribosomal 16S amplicon sequences to quantify taxonomic composition and diversity of bacteria in yellow starthistle microbiomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%