2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03578-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of MRI review following the diagnosis of atypical cartilaginous tumour using image-guided needle biopsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with other types of bone tumors, high rates of discrepancies between biopsy findings and final diagnoses were reported in cartilaginous tumors [ 3 , 5 , 7 , 24 ]. In previous studies, 14–57% of patients with cartilaginous tumors had discrepancies in the histological grade between biopsy results and final diagnosis [ 5 , 7 , 25 , 26 ]. Especially, histological distinction of ACT/grade I chondrosarcoma from enchondroma is difficult in many cases for pathologists because of their similar cytology, cellularity, and cartilaginous matrix [ 9 , 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other types of bone tumors, high rates of discrepancies between biopsy findings and final diagnoses were reported in cartilaginous tumors [ 3 , 5 , 7 , 24 ]. In previous studies, 14–57% of patients with cartilaginous tumors had discrepancies in the histological grade between biopsy results and final diagnosis [ 5 , 7 , 25 , 26 ]. Especially, histological distinction of ACT/grade I chondrosarcoma from enchondroma is difficult in many cases for pathologists because of their similar cytology, cellularity, and cartilaginous matrix [ 9 , 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the total sample size was 568 patients with a range of 9 to 179 sample sizes. Among these studies, five studies were conducted in the United Kingdom [ 28 - 32 ], two in the United States [ 33 , 34 ], two in Germany [ 35 , 36 ], two in Italy [ 37 , 38 ], two in China [ 39 , 40 ], one in Korea [ 41 ], one in Japan [ 42 ], and one in Switzerland [ 43 ]. The baseline and summary of the included studies are presented in Table 1 .…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall quality of the included study varied hugely. According to the risk-assessment results, we found that seven studies [ 30 - 32 , 34 , 39 - 41 ] had a low risk of bias while only two were classified as high-risk studies [ 29 , 36 ]. In terms of confounding bias, only two studies [ 34 , 42 ] had a moderate risk of bias while none of the studies had a high risk.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations