2014
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2014.941527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of players in teams of the German Bundesliga in the season 2012/2013 – a cooperative game theory approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discussion about the relationship between compensation systems and individual performance is central to the sports industry (Montanari et al , 2008). Also, a relevant topic for researchers is the relationship between the player’s performance and the salary received (Lucifora and Simmons, 2003; Hiller, 2015; Gavião et al , 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion about the relationship between compensation systems and individual performance is central to the sports industry (Montanari et al , 2008). Also, a relevant topic for researchers is the relationship between the player’s performance and the salary received (Lucifora and Simmons, 2003; Hiller, 2015; Gavião et al , 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After new searches in scientific literature of fuzzy games (Casagrande and Ranganathan 2015;Rahaman and Ahmad 2015), linguistic and semantic approaches in game theory (Tao et al 2015), cooperative game theory (Leng et al 2014) and application of game theory in the power negotiation and others (Cobanli 2014;Hiller 2015), the authors concluded that nowadays this is a very important subject of research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While the problem of how to rank players or teams in tournament situations is of primary importance for sport competitions, and it has received a lot of attention in the game theoretic literature – for instance, focusing on the strategic behavior of competitors who want to manipulate the outcome of a tournament (Csató 2019c , 2020a , b , 2021 ; Dagaev and Sonin 2018 ; Pauly 2014 ; Vong 2017 ), or providing some impossibility results for rankings in generalized tournaments (Csató 2019a , b ) – there have been only few attempts to compare each player’s contributions to the success of their own team (Vilain and Kolkovsky 2016 ). Recently, some approaches using coalitional games and power indices have been applied to assess the performance of sportsmen based on outcomes of their team (Hernández-Lamoneda and Sánchez-Sánchez 2010 ; Hiller 2015 ). Classical power indices, like the Shapley value/index (Shapley 1953 ), are computed from such coalitional games to convert the performance of coalitions into an individual attribution representing each player’s role in the team during the championship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%