2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of retrospective findings in child maltreatment research

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
119
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
119
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Neglect (prospective) and sexual abuse were associated with social mobility ( 29 and rather than relying on individual items, we used a composite score.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglect (prospective) and sexual abuse were associated with social mobility ( 29 and rather than relying on individual items, we used a composite score.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kendall-Tackett and Becker-Blease (2004) noted that prospective studies may miss a considerable number of cases of abuse; that identified abuse may lead to interventions that interrupt some psychological consequences of maltreatment; and that unreported abuse may be more severe. Brewin, Andrews, and Gotlib (1993) demonstrated that available data, including those from prospective studies (e.g., Horwitz, Widom, McLaughlin, & White, 2001), do not support mood-congruent hypotheses of reporting abuse experiences (Brewin et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, retrospective reports of abuse have some pronounced advantages over documented samples. Kendall-Tackett and Becker-Blease (2004) identified at least two major advantages of retrospective reports over documented samples: (a) They are less prone to missed cases and underreporting (as so few abuse cases get documented), and (b) they are more representative of most cases of abuse (in that documenting abuse requires numerous factors and has pronounced impact on the victim).…”
Section: How Do We Know It? Thinking Critically About Methods Samplementioning
confidence: 99%