2001
DOI: 10.1067/moe.2001.115130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of routine magnetic resonance imaging in trigeminal neuralgia diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
27
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Neuroimaging with head computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be useful for identifying patients that have a structural lesion as the cause of painful trigeminal neuropathy 19,20 . High-resolution brain MRI and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) may be useful to identify vascular compression as the etiology of classic TN.…”
Section: Trigeminal Neuralgia Diagnosis and Diff Erential Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuroimaging with head computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be useful for identifying patients that have a structural lesion as the cause of painful trigeminal neuropathy 19,20 . High-resolution brain MRI and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) may be useful to identify vascular compression as the etiology of classic TN.…”
Section: Trigeminal Neuralgia Diagnosis and Diff Erential Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five articles (one graded Class IV) reported the results of head imaging on consecutive patients diagnosed with TN with normal neurologic examinations (table e-1). [4][5][6][7][8] Four studies included cohorts of patients with TN assembled at tertiary centers with an interest in TN. Because more complicated and potentially less representative patients with TN get treated at such centers, these studies were judged to be at risk for referral bias and thus were graded Class III.…”
Section: Analysis Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found seven papers (one graded Class IV) studying the diagnostic accuracy of clinical characteristics potentially distinguishing STN from CTN (table e-2). [4][5][6][8][9][10][11] Clinical characteristics studied included the presence of sensory deficits, age at onset, first division of trigeminal nerve affected, bilateral trigeminal involvement, and unresponsiveness to treatment. One study was graded Class III because of a case control design with a narrow spectrum of patients.…”
Section: Analysis Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 Selective indications for imaging, specifi cally magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for patients with TN include young patients, patients failing to respond to medical therapy, those with an atypical history or clinical signs such as involvement of more than one division of the trigeminal nerve, bilateral involvement, and the presence of other cranial nerve abnormalities. 7 TN type pain was the only presenting feature in this case. There was no facial weakness or hearing loss, and the patient was younger than usual to be experiencing a classic TN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%