2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of the Human Footprint in Shaping the Global Distribution of Terrestrial, Freshwater and Marine Invaders

Abstract: Human activities such as transport, trade and tourism are likely to influence the spatial distribution of non-native species and yet, Species Distribution Models (SDMs) that aim to predict the future broad scale distribution of invaders often rely on environmental (e.g. climatic) information only. This study investigates if and to what extent do human activities that directly or indirectly influence nature (hereafter the human footprint) affect the global distribution of invasive species in terrestrial, freshw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
147
1
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
7
147
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The human footprint was associated mainly with L. laeta , which agrees with the recognized synanthropy of this species, whereas S. globula is found in human dwellings and is also relatively frequent in natural environments (Taucare‐Ríos et al ., ). The human footprint explained 20.6% of the distribution of S. globula and 48.6% of the distribution of L. laeta ; the latter value is very high compared with the average of 21% (Gallardo et al ., ) reported for terrestrial invaders. This indicates that this species may be considered as highly invasive, like other Loxosceles species such as Loxosceles rufescens (Luo & Li, ), and agrees with reports of its introduction into North America, Central America, Finland and Australia (Gonçalves‐de‐Andrade & Tambourgi, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The human footprint was associated mainly with L. laeta , which agrees with the recognized synanthropy of this species, whereas S. globula is found in human dwellings and is also relatively frequent in natural environments (Taucare‐Ríos et al ., ). The human footprint explained 20.6% of the distribution of S. globula and 48.6% of the distribution of L. laeta ; the latter value is very high compared with the average of 21% (Gallardo et al ., ) reported for terrestrial invaders. This indicates that this species may be considered as highly invasive, like other Loxosceles species such as Loxosceles rufescens (Luo & Li, ), and agrees with reports of its introduction into North America, Central America, Finland and Australia (Gonçalves‐de‐Andrade & Tambourgi, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To provide an ecologically meaningful analysis of the conservation gaps of the black-necked crane’s breeding habitats, we used (i) the World Database on Protected Areas (http://www.protectedplanet.net/) to infer an area’s conservation status 32 and (ii) the Human Influence Index (HII; http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/) to infer an area’s human population status 33 . We used HII because extensive unpopulated areas located in this region remain ecologically primitive and therefore should be excluded from conservation gaps, which are generated for revealing the priorities for future conservation efforts 32 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species' geographic distributions are increasingly influenced by climate change and human-mediated dispersal (Walther et al 2009, Keller et al 2014, Gallardo et al 2015 Physiology in ecological niche modeling: using zebra mussel's upper thermal tolerance to refine model predictions through Bayesian analysis Xiao Feng, Ye Liang, Belinda Gallardo and Monica Papeş ) ✉ (fengxiao@email.arizona.edu), Inst. of the Environment, Univ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%