1986
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.83.19.7348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The in vivo mutagenic frequency and specificity of O6-methylguanine in phi X174 replicative form DNA.

Abstract: A bacteriophage 4X174-based site-specific mutagenesis system for the study of the in vivo mutagenic frequency and specificity of carcinogen-induced modification in DNA is presented. A (-)-strand primer containing 06 methylguanine in a specific site was hybridized to a singlestranded region in gene G of OX gapped duplex DNA. The hybrid was enzymatically converted to replicative form DNA and was used to transform Escherichia coli cells. All gene G mutants generated by the modification were rescued by genetic com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, upon introduction into E. coli cells, the O 6 -alkylguanine adduct located within the unique SmaI restriction site contained in the plasmid is processed by repair pathways and/or undergoes replication. Due to the high miscoding capacity of these adducts (1)(2)(3)(4), unrepaired adducts will yield plasmid progeny containing a majority of G→A transitions at the adduct site, thus inactivating the SmaI restriction site. With single-stranded constructs, the mutant fraction may reach 100% if the adduct is fully miscoding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Briefly, upon introduction into E. coli cells, the O 6 -alkylguanine adduct located within the unique SmaI restriction site contained in the plasmid is processed by repair pathways and/or undergoes replication. Due to the high miscoding capacity of these adducts (1)(2)(3)(4), unrepaired adducts will yield plasmid progeny containing a majority of G→A transitions at the adduct site, thus inactivating the SmaI restriction site. With single-stranded constructs, the mutant fraction may reach 100% if the adduct is fully miscoding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their low abundance, O 6 -alkylguanine adducts are responsible for most biological consequences induced by alkylating agents, both in terms of mutagenesis and toxicity. Whereas mutagenesis results from the capacity of these adducts to mispair efficiently with T during replication (1)(2)(3)(4), the way these adducts induce toxicity is more cumbersome. Indeed, cytotoxicity involves the mismatch repair (MMR) system that recognizes the mutagenic O 6 -methylguanine: T (mG:T) replication intermediates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net biological impact of a lesion depends on the balance between the ability of the cell to repair the lesion and the mutagenic and toxic properties of the lesion. One particularly critical type of DNA alkylation damage is O 6 -methylguanine (O 6 mG), which has been shown to be both mutagenic [1][2][3][4] and, when cells cannot distinguish nascent from parental DNA strands, toxic [5][6][7]. Extensive in vivo mutagenesis studies done in our laboratory and others established that O 6 mG codes as adenine during replication in E. coli nearly 100% of the time [1,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, 70 mutations per genome were observed. The overwhelming majority of the changes are G:C 3 A:T transitions, well in accord with the known mutagenic specificity of EMS (15)(16)(17)(18)(19). The genome-wide distribution of the newly acquired mutations induced by EMS in the CC102 strain This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Fig. 3A (Top) shows the standard model of the EMS-induced O 6 alkyl guanine specifically mispairing with thymine, resulting in a G to A replacement upon the second round of replication (15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Considering now a continuous stretch of DNA, and assuming that each strand in the original DNA is randomly affected by EMS, one would expect that the segregation between daughter strands into different cells after replication will lead to each descendant cell having exclusively G 3 A or C 3 T conversions (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%