1999
DOI: 10.3758/bf03201216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
89
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, when designers where shown an external example -specifically, a sketch of a "drive-in window food tray" -they created less original designs because the example narrowed their cognitive search , leading them to access a smaller proportion of far analogies (analogies to distant domains) than designers who were not shown any example. This phenomenon, which cognitive scientists have called "unconscious plagiarism" (Marsh, Ward and Landau 1999) supports the idea that analogical reasoning is not necessarily an enabler of creative thinking, but can also represent a constraint in problem-solving. In an organizational context, then, analogies with existing dominant institutions can help legitimize institutional entrepreneurship, but might also limit the range of alternatives that institutional designers consider, because their cognitive search (Simon, 1947, Ocasio, 1997, will immediately be directed towards one source domain -the dominant institution.…”
Section: The Role Of Analogiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast, when designers where shown an external example -specifically, a sketch of a "drive-in window food tray" -they created less original designs because the example narrowed their cognitive search , leading them to access a smaller proportion of far analogies (analogies to distant domains) than designers who were not shown any example. This phenomenon, which cognitive scientists have called "unconscious plagiarism" (Marsh, Ward and Landau 1999) supports the idea that analogical reasoning is not necessarily an enabler of creative thinking, but can also represent a constraint in problem-solving. In an organizational context, then, analogies with existing dominant institutions can help legitimize institutional entrepreneurship, but might also limit the range of alternatives that institutional designers consider, because their cognitive search (Simon, 1947, Ocasio, 1997, will immediately be directed towards one source domain -the dominant institution.…”
Section: The Role Of Analogiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To follow the example, thinking of greeting in relatively abstract terms as a "way to socialize" or a "gesture of communication" might lead to more diverse and original solutions than thinking of it as "waving the hand" or "saying hello." Therefore, whereas the former might lead to solutions that are more remote and diverse from the actual object, the latter might render common associates overaccessible, impeding innovation (see Marsh, Ward, & Landau, 1999). Extrapolating from this logic, abstract construal of problem elements may be particularly beneficial for creativity when individuals are required to generate relatively abstract solutions (e.g., creative reasons for why to greet somebody, as opposed to creative ways of how to greet somebody).…”
Section: Temporal Perspective: Influences On Insight and Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bonnardel (2000) showed that when subjects are given names of objects rather than specific examples or no examples they spontaneously suggest more analogies. Others found that showing specific examples prior to a design or creative task often fixates subjects (Jansson & Smith, 1991;Marsh, Landau, & Hicks, 1996;Marsh, Ward, & Landau, 1999;Smith, Ward, & Schumacher, 1993). Cardoso and Badke-Schaub (2011) found that when subjects are shown examples that are too realistic they fixate more often.…”
Section: Design Studies Vol 34 No 2 March 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%