A new estimate of Agulhas leakage transport is calculated using profiling floats and drifters.Since Richardson's seminal estimate of 15 Sv in 2007, the number of floats and drifters passing through the Agulhas Current has quadrupled. Within uncertainties we find the same leakage percentages as Richardson, with 34% of drifters leaking at the surface and 21% of floats leaking at 1,000 m depth. We find that the drifters tend to follow a northward leakage pathway via the Benguela Current compared to the northwestward leakage pathway of the floats along the Agulhas Ring corridor. We simulate the isobaric and profiling behavior of the floats and drifters using two high resolution models and two offline Lagrangian tracking tools, quantifying for the first time the sampling biases associated with the observations. We find that the isobaric bias cannot be robustly simulated but likely causes an underestimate of observed leakage by one or two Sverdrups. The profiling behavior of the floats causes no significant bias in the leakage. Fitting a simulated vertical leakage profile to the observed leakage percentages from the floats and drifters and using the mean Agulhas transport observed by a moored array at 34 • S we find an improved Agulhas leakage transport of 21.3 Sv, with an estimated error of 4.7 Sv. Our new leakage transport is higher primarily because we account for leakage at depths down to 2,000 m, while Richardson considered only the top 1,000 m of the water column.
Plain Language SummaryWe calculate a new estimation of Agulhas leakage using floats and drifters. Since most recent estimate of 15 Sv was calculated in 2007, we have had four times as many observations pass through the Agulhas Current. We find more drifters leak at the surface than floats at intermediate depth. The drifters follow a northward leakage passage compared to the northwestward passage of the floats. Using two models and two particle tracking tools, we mimic the behavior of these floats and drifters to better understand and quantify the sampling biases associated with these observations. Combining the results from the observations and these simulations, we calculate a new improved leakage transport of 21.3 Sv with an error of 4.7 Sv.Quantifying Agulhas leakage is difficult, with previous estimates ranging from 2 to 20 Sv (1 Sv = 1 × 10 6 m 3 s −1 ). The Cape Basin features the highest eddy kinetic energy outside a western boundary current system in the world (Chelton et al., 2011). Due to this highly turbulent nature, the mixing and stirring