The Handbook of South American Archaeology 2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-74907-5_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Inca Empire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries AD, the Inkas conquered a vast territory in pre-Columbian South America and exerted rule over numerous polities and ethnic groups, ranging from powerful states, such as Chimú on the Peruvian north Pacific coast, to the large chiefdoms of the Titicaca basin, and from the indomitable Cañaris of Ecuador to the less complex communities of the South Andes. In order to control these multiple lands and peoples, they applied a variety of strategies of domination which encompassed the thorough bureaucratic administration of provincial lands (D'Altroy 2002;Covey 2008;Urton 2008), an overarching financial system based on corvée labour, attached craft specialists, state farms, storage facilities (Murra 1978;Earle & D'Altroy 1989;D'Altroy 2002), the manipulation of native structures of power, the forced relocation of ethnic communities (Murra 1978;Hyslop 1979;Pease 1982) and control over feasting and ritual activities, including the co-option of paramount Andean pilgrim centres and indigenous shrines (Bauer & Stanish 2001;Dillehay 2003;Morris & Covey 2003;Morris & Santillana 2007;Besom 2009).…”
Section: Inka Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries AD, the Inkas conquered a vast territory in pre-Columbian South America and exerted rule over numerous polities and ethnic groups, ranging from powerful states, such as Chimú on the Peruvian north Pacific coast, to the large chiefdoms of the Titicaca basin, and from the indomitable Cañaris of Ecuador to the less complex communities of the South Andes. In order to control these multiple lands and peoples, they applied a variety of strategies of domination which encompassed the thorough bureaucratic administration of provincial lands (D'Altroy 2002;Covey 2008;Urton 2008), an overarching financial system based on corvée labour, attached craft specialists, state farms, storage facilities (Murra 1978;Earle & D'Altroy 1989;D'Altroy 2002), the manipulation of native structures of power, the forced relocation of ethnic communities (Murra 1978;Hyslop 1979;Pease 1982) and control over feasting and ritual activities, including the co-option of paramount Andean pilgrim centres and indigenous shrines (Bauer & Stanish 2001;Dillehay 2003;Morris & Covey 2003;Morris & Santillana 2007;Besom 2009).…”
Section: Inka Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terracing and irrigation for several millennia before European arrival provide compelling evidence that pre‐Columbian cultures transformed many Andean landscapes through agriculture (Covey, ; Denevan, ; Isbell, ). The earliest archaeological evidence suggesting human occupation of the Andes dates c .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale and regional administrative function of Inka central plazas set them apart from patterns of urban layout seen in other state capitals in the Andean region, suggesting that the periodic assembly of multiple groups in open spaces was a key aspect of Inka statecraft (Covey, 2008b;Morris and Covey, 2003). The civic/administrative functions of the Inka central plaza become apparent when considering the various characteristics of an Andean encounter called tinku, and how such social interactions were performed in Cusco's Haucaypata plaza in Inka times.…”
Section: Inka Central Plazasmentioning
confidence: 99%