2017
DOI: 10.5694/mja17.00284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The incidence and multiplicity rates of keratinocyte cancers in Australia

Abstract: The incidence and multiplicity of keratinocyte cancer in Australia are very high, causing a large disease burden that has not previously been quantified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
119
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
119
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear why Northern Ireland has a higher cSCC incidence compared with other nations; this could relate to a higher number of outdoor occupations, recent public health campaigns, variation in clinical practice or data collection . Compared with elsewhere in the world, incidence rates of KC in the U.K. are lower than those published in Australia, but higher than elsewhere in Europe and the U.S.A., with varying rates presumably due to skin type/genetic predisposition and UVR exposure …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is unclear why Northern Ireland has a higher cSCC incidence compared with other nations; this could relate to a higher number of outdoor occupations, recent public health campaigns, variation in clinical practice or data collection . Compared with elsewhere in the world, incidence rates of KC in the U.K. are lower than those published in Australia, but higher than elsewhere in Europe and the U.S.A., with varying rates presumably due to skin type/genetic predisposition and UVR exposure …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Likewise, after an initial cSCC, the 5‐year risk of a further cSCC is estimated to be 37% . Previous studies have shown that when counting all BCCs as opposed to the first registered BCC, an additional 30–50% of tumours are counted . Changes in cancer registration processes in England, including the introduction of national automated registration have enabled the development of a more comprehensive BCC and cSCC dataset for the first time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the most recent national survey, KC incidence was not estimated for the period 2003–2016 6 . National and state/territory estimates for KC have recently been reported for the period 2011–2014 by the QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute in Queensland by analysis of a 10% population sample of all persons registered with Medicare 7 . Estimates of the BCC:SCC ratio were also reported in this study, extrapolated from the ratios found in the validated Queensland QSkin survey 7 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…National and state/territory estimates for KC have recently been reported for the period 2011–2014 by the QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute in Queensland by analysis of a 10% population sample of all persons registered with Medicare 7 . Estimates of the BCC:SCC ratio were also reported in this study, extrapolated from the ratios found in the validated Queensland QSkin survey 7 . Prior to this publication, a systematic review of NMSC in Australia identified only two studies that investigated total incidence at the state/territory level; these were in Tasmania and the Northern Territory in the 1980s 8 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in most Australian and U.S. cancer registries), or else only the first occurrence was ever recorded for any particular person. For cancers that are prone to multiplicity this approach has led to gross under‐reporting. With the advent of digital pathology reporting and sophisticated coding algorithms, the resource constraints that inhibited earlier manual coding efforts have largely disappeared.…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%