2009
DOI: 10.1086/598688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Incidence of U.S. Agricultural Subsidies on Farmland Rental Rates

Abstract: This paper identifies the effect of agricultural subsidies on farmland rental rates in the United States. Rental agreements are primarily between farmers and non-farmer landlords, but no evidence exists concerning the incidence of subsidies on these two groups. By exploiting a unique policy change in 1996 and a nationally representative dataset of individual farms, I solve the endogeneity problem with fixed effects and instrumental variables techniques. I show that non-farmer landlords capture forty percent of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
151
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
151
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the USA, "farmers who rent the land and cultivate it capture 75% of the subsidy, leaving just 25% for the landowners. This finding contradicts the prediction from the neoclassical models" (Kirwan 2009). …”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…In the USA, "farmers who rent the land and cultivate it capture 75% of the subsidy, leaving just 25% for the landowners. This finding contradicts the prediction from the neoclassical models" (Kirwan 2009). …”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Myriads of hedonic pricing studies have been conducted that reveal the impact of farmland characteristics, the location of environmental variables, and subsidies and regulatory measures on land leasing rates (e.g. Swinnen et al 2008, Kirwan 2009, Breustedt and Habermann 2011. One issue, however, remains relatively unexplored in the empirical literature, namely the role of the term, for example the length of the leasing contract.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same data, Kirwan (2005) finds in a related study that landowners capture on average between $0.20 and $0.40 of the marginal per acre subsidy dollar depending on the region and farm size.…”
Section: Support Measures and Capitalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%