2006
DOI: 10.1080/00411450600878615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Incident Flux Response Expansion Method for Heterogeneous Coarse Mesh Transport Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all problems, the multigroup dependence was exactly treated while the spatial dependence was expanded in discrete Legendre polynomials [5,23] DLPs.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For all problems, the multigroup dependence was exactly treated while the spatial dependence was expanded in discrete Legendre polynomials [5,23] DLPs.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a rather general approach is described based on expansions of the boundary conditions that couple subvolumes of the global problem, a formalism introduced as early as the work of Lindahl [4] and studied more recently by several authors [5,6,7].…”
Section: The Eigenvalue Response Matrix Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1.1.6). It is noted that other expansion bases may be used to treat this angular dependence [3]. The selection of basis may be best determined by optimizing for the specific solution method used to solve the resulting transport equations in the system (e.g., core).…”
Section: Project Tasks Task 11 Derive a New Multi-group Transpomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(84), (85) The RM method has been also implemented by Farzad and co-workers at Georgia Tech in the code COMET, but these authors have opted for the parameterization of the response matrices in terms of the eigenvalue, which introduces an approximation via the matrix interpolations. The original derivation of the RM equations was done with a variational formulation (86), (87) but was later reformulated in the simpler form given here. (88), (13) The interface angular modes are a factorized product of space, angle and energy functions, Here each face of the subdomain has been partitioned into surfaces and {pαs(r)} is a set of orthogonal polynomials on surface α; the {hm(Ω)} is a set of spherical functions on the half unit sphere and χg(E) is the characteristic function of group g. Clearly, the representation functions of lowest order, pα0(r) = 1 and h1(Ω) = 1, are constant.…”
Section: In This Expression F(i) A(i) and J+(i) -J-(i)mentioning
confidence: 99%