2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The incorporation of strontium and zinc into a calcium–silicon ceramic for bone tissue engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
178
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
178
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports have shown that Sr-loaded biomaterial scaffolds exhibited increase resorption/dissolution comparing with uncoated ones [21,22]. For instance, a calcium-silicon ceramic [22] and a mesoporous bioactive glass scaffold [21] were more readily resorbed when loaded with Sr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous reports have shown that Sr-loaded biomaterial scaffolds exhibited increase resorption/dissolution comparing with uncoated ones [21,22]. For instance, a calcium-silicon ceramic [22] and a mesoporous bioactive glass scaffold [21] were more readily resorbed when loaded with Sr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Systemic administration of Sr (in the form of Sr ranelate-SrR) has been shown to improve bone quality and reduces the risk of fractures both in females with postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoporotic men [17,18]. More recently, several experimental studies have shown promising results in terms of increased bone formation after Sr enrichment of various bone substitute materials, such as allogeneic bone [19], bioactive bioglass [20,21], calciumsilicon ceramic [22], calcium phosphate [23,24], and hydroxyapatite [25,26]. Furthermore, it was observed in recent experiments that Sr-loaded titanium implants presented significantly increased bone-to-implant contact, comparing to control implants [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In response to the beneficial effects of Sr 2+ ion release, a variety of strategies have been proposed including the incorporation of Sr 2+ into ceramic coatings, bioactive glasses, etc [6,55,56]. The advantage of incorporating Sr 2+ ions into the bulk of Mg alloy, such as the J1 alloy, resides in the stable and continued ion release (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sr increases osteoblast replication, differentiation, and bone matrix mineralization relying on calcium sensing receptor dependent mechanism [3][4][5]. Previous studies incorporated Sr into calcium phosphate coatings or bioactive glasses to stimulate the bone formation [6][7][8][9]. Nonetheless, long-lasting Sr release at a reasonably constant rate is hardly achieved in these cases due to low and unstable solubility of Sr in calcium phosphates and glasses [10,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…18,20,27 Thus, constant in situ release of Sr at a proper dose directly at the implant-tissue interface has been proposed to enhance the implant osseointegration, and multiple recent studies have investigated the benefits of Sr loading onto biomaterials. 21,[28][29][30][31] On the basis of the hypothesis that the combination of an appropriate NT-coated surface and controllable, long-term Sr release may give rise to a material with an enhanced ability to promote osteogenesis and thus achieve rigid implant osseointegration, we developed a series of NT-coated, Sr-loaded Ti samples and found that the NT-Sr structure with suitable Sr loading led to improved proliferation, spreading, and osteogenic differentiation of in vitro cultured MSCs. 32 Although our in vitro results were promising, in vivo observations are necessary to draw a final conclusion on the osseointegration ability of a biomaterial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%