2021
DOI: 10.1080/1062936x.2021.1925344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The index of ideality of correlation: QSAR studies of hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease inhibitors using SMILES descriptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models constructed based on the hybrid descriptors are statistically better than the models constructed by individually SMILES or graph descriptors. 19–21…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The models constructed based on the hybrid descriptors are statistically better than the models constructed by individually SMILES or graph descriptors. 19–21…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models constructed based on the hybrid descriptors are statistically better than the models constructed by individually SMILES or graph descriptors. [19][20][21] The index of ideality of correlation (IIC) has been implemented by the theoretical chemist to validate and improve the predictive potential constructed QSAR/QSTR models. 14,[22][23][24][25] The IIC is a parameter for assessing the predictive capability of QSPR/QSAR models that takes into account not only the coef-cient of correlation, but also the organization of the group of dots images relative to the diagonal, in "observed-calculated" endpoint coordinates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented eqn (4)-( 6) emphasize that the preferable values of the T and N epoch for split 1 are 15 and 8, respectively; the preferable values of the T and N epoch for split 2 are 4 and 25, respectively; and the preferable values of T and N epoch for split 3 are 2 and 7, respectively. One of the chief aims of this research was to determine the molecular fragments, defined as the optimal SMILES notation descriptors that have a positive and negative influence on the studied activity, according to published methodology; 27,28,[43][44][45] the full list of the calculated molecular descriptors, based both on the molecular graph and the SMILES notation, is presented in Table S2 (ESI †). Table 3 presents an example of calculating a molecule's summarized correlation weight (DCW) and the studied activity (C : P ratio).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…active training, passive training, calibration and validation. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] The objective of this study is to construct a predictive QSPR model using the Monte Carlo technique of the CORAL soware for the retention index property of 273 VOCs recognized in peppers. Ten random splits are made and each split is divided into four subsets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%