The Indigeneity Clause and the Mismanagement of Ethnic Diversity in Nigeria

Abstract

Purpose: Nigeria is characterized by ethnic diversity and the quest to achieve ‘unity in diversity’ led to its adoption of federalism as the basic structure and principle of governance. Over six decades after independence, the country remains sharply divided along ethnic lines, and national unity remains a mirage. While there is a burgeoning body of research on the causes, manifestations, and consequences of ethnic diversity mismanagement in Nigeria, few attempts have been made to analytically study the effects of constitutional provisions on the phenomenon. The study, thus, examined the effects of the indigeneity clause in the Nigerian constitution on ethnic diversity management in the country. Research methodology: The study is based on a review of secondary data on Nigeria’s constitutional provisions and institutional processes. Results: It identified that the indigeneity clause in the country’s constitutions has created different notions of citizenship and further exacerbated differences between ethnic groups in the country. The clause established two classes of Nigerians, indigenes, and settlers, and the ensuing ‘us against them’ culture lies at the root of ethnic tensions witnessed in the country. Limitations: Other issues, apart from the indigeneity clause, may also lead to the mismanagement of ethnic diversity in the country. Contribution: The findings and recommendations of the study provide a veritable template to help ensure good ethnic diversity management in Nigeria and other multi-ethnic states. Keywords: 1. citizenship 2. ethnicity 3. indigenes 4. indigeneity clause 5. settlers

Regional boundary conflict of Malaka Regency versus South Central Timor (TTS) regency in lotas segment

“…Public consultation to share information with each other, express the views of each conflicting party, so that the settlement can take place efficiently and fairly. Everything is done to ensure that all parties get the same satisfaction in resolving conflicts (Adenuga, 2022). b.…”

Intra-Party Conflicts and Party Stability in Nigeria: A Study of the Alliance for Democracy (AD)

“…The character of political parties in the country has also been shaped by the country's political history including the mismanagement of ethnic diversity in the country (Adenuga, 2022) which led to most of the parties assuming ethnic identities, especially in the first and second republics (Adegbami & Uche, 2015;Chidi, 2015;Yagboyaju & Akinola, 2019). Military interventions in politics, which brought abrupt ends to the first, second and third republics, have also been seen as reasons for the inability of political parties to develop internal democratic practices and act as agents of entrenching democratic consolidation in the country.…”