2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The individual courtship behaviour of male European mink (Mustela lutreola) is a good indicator for their breeding success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of species-specific courtship and mating behaviour in "non-breeding European mink (Mustela lutreola) males" threatens the conservation goal to maintain the genetic heterozygosity of the ex situ population; from a practical point of view, behavioural indicators could be used as a potential screening method for identifying successful future breeders. Recently, Kneidinger et al (2018) found that one of the key elements of male courtship behaviour was the vocalization "clucking", essential for a breeding attempt to end with copulation.…”
Section: Ex-situ Breeding Of Critically Endangered Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of species-specific courtship and mating behaviour in "non-breeding European mink (Mustela lutreola) males" threatens the conservation goal to maintain the genetic heterozygosity of the ex situ population; from a practical point of view, behavioural indicators could be used as a potential screening method for identifying successful future breeders. Recently, Kneidinger et al (2018) found that one of the key elements of male courtship behaviour was the vocalization "clucking", essential for a breeding attempt to end with copulation.…”
Section: Ex-situ Breeding Of Critically Endangered Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our study, we combined the times that a ferret spent inside each novel nest box, and used this as our measure of exploration. We then used an ethogram to partition exploration into specific behaviors (Table 1) drawn from other mustelid work (Biggins et al, 2012; Kneidinger et al, 2018; Miller et al, 1996; Noer et al, 2017; Pedersen et al, 2004; Vargas & Anderson, 1998). We categorized behaviors into different ferret states, including “Investigative,” “Reproductive,” “Vigilance,” and “Comfort” (Breck et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservation breeding programs are characterized by the selection of the genetically most suitable pairs for reproduction, identified according to their genetic representation among the population to avoid inbreeding [ 136 ]. A common problem is that the specifically selected partners for breeding do not mate during the breeding attempts [ 136 ]. Kneidinger et al [ 136 ] reported that, on average, just over 30% of the planned litters were sired by the genetically prioritized males.…”
Section: Conservation Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common problem is that the specifically selected partners for breeding do not mate during the breeding attempts [ 136 ]. Kneidinger et al [ 136 ] reported that, on average, just over 30% of the planned litters were sired by the genetically prioritized males. The influence of selection on the behavioral traits of breeding males on shaping the gene pool in captivity is not yet recognized.…”
Section: Conservation Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation