1983
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(83)90047-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The induction of micronuclei as a measure of genotoxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
84
0
8

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 660 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
9
84
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, fish are not normally very useful for certain cytogenetic techniques, such as chromosome aberration tests and sister chromatid exchanges, because they have a large number of small chromosomes (Belpaeme et al, 1996). The MN test has been used successfully as a mutagenic assay since it is simple, reliable, sensitive, and is not strongly dependent on any karyotypic characteristics (Heddle et al, 1983). The methods using fish erythrocytes are not time consuming and can be done without causing suffering to the animals (Minissi et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, fish are not normally very useful for certain cytogenetic techniques, such as chromosome aberration tests and sister chromatid exchanges, because they have a large number of small chromosomes (Belpaeme et al, 1996). The MN test has been used successfully as a mutagenic assay since it is simple, reliable, sensitive, and is not strongly dependent on any karyotypic characteristics (Heddle et al, 1983). The methods using fish erythrocytes are not time consuming and can be done without causing suffering to the animals (Minissi et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 presents the binomial error in the count of MN cells in an individual animal obtained by scoring 2000, 4000, 8000, or 20,000 RETs as a function of the spontaneous frequency of MN-RETs. It should be noted that the spontaneous frequency in rodent bone marrow or peripheral blood reported by different experienced laboratories has ranged from 0.05% in rat (see individual laboratory values in [14]) to a mean value of 0.2% in the mouse [15,16] and 0.31% in the beagle dog. Since the counting error depends on the background rate and the number of cells scored, we have tabulated values over the range of spontaneous frequencies commonly reported in rodents and recently observed in the beagle dog (manuscript in preparation).…”
Section: Inter-animal Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A description of the two mutagenicity tests is provided in two reviews (Preston et al, 1981;Heddle et al, 1983). Data on all the compounds that have also been tested in /acl mice were compiled from the original Iiterature; the specific references consulted are noted in Table 3.…”
Section: Micronucleus Test and Chromosome Aberration Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerably smaller doses gave significant effects in the subchronic studies (28-120 days), due to an accumulation of mutations over the expo· sure period. In the liver, an increase in sensitivity of the test was possible over quite a long time (Friedman and Staub, 1977;23 (rat;IARC, 1978;Watanabe et al, 1982;NIOSH, 1987) Heddle et al, 1983 N-Nitrosomethylurea 2.3 (lOS, liv) no data 8 (Frei and Venitt, 1975) Urethane 130 (lOS, tun) 220 (Heddle et al, 1983) 5000 (Colnaghi et al, 1969 period: after a 28-day exposure to 2-AAF, a dose of 80 mgl kgl day was required to produce a 3-fold increase in mutant frequency, whereas after 120 days' exposure, 11 mgl kgl day sufficed to produce a 3.5-fold increase. The induced mutant frequency was roughly proportional to the integral of dose over time, i.e., the effect depended primarily on the total dose administered, independent of the dosing schedule.…”
Section: Accumulation Ofmutations In Subchronic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation