2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of abrasive particle size in copper chemical mechanical planarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As is well-known, the uniformity and shape of the abrasive particles in the polishing slurry play a crucial role in their polishing effect. 25 The structural characteristics of the abrasive particles in the CMP slurry reported in this study are better than those of previously reported materials. 26 The material removal rate (MRR, μm h −1 ) can be calculated by the following equation: 16 where Δ m is the mass loss of copper wafers after polishing (g), ρ is the density of the copper wafers (8.9 g cm −3 ), S is the total contact area between the polishing pad and copper substrates (mm 2 ) and t is the polishing time (h).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…As is well-known, the uniformity and shape of the abrasive particles in the polishing slurry play a crucial role in their polishing effect. 25 The structural characteristics of the abrasive particles in the CMP slurry reported in this study are better than those of previously reported materials. 26 The material removal rate (MRR, μm h −1 ) can be calculated by the following equation: 16 where Δ m is the mass loss of copper wafers after polishing (g), ρ is the density of the copper wafers (8.9 g cm −3 ), S is the total contact area between the polishing pad and copper substrates (mm 2 ) and t is the polishing time (h).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…These are 318 ± 29 HV, 322 ± 30 HV, 351 ± 31 HV and 376 ± 33 HV, respectively. The electropolished samples have higher hardness values than samples that are not electropolished because samples that are not electropolished show crack initiation because stress is concentrated [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Nevertheless, CMP is affected by numerous parameters such as the type of abrasive, pressure on the workpiece as well as polishing pad, 16 and the morphology, size, physical, and chemical properties of abrasive are considered to be one of the most crucial factors affecting the surface quality. 17,18 Cerium oxide (CeO 2 ) as the abrasive is widely used for CMP of fused silica due to its combined with satisfactory surface finish and roughness as well as relatively high material removal rate (MRR). 19,20 Owing to the wide size distribution of commercial CeO 2 , which a proportion of coarse particles in the slurry can lead to surface defect, 21 it is difficult to satisfy the increasing demand for surface quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) technology is the only super smooth surface processing technology that can achieve global planarization and nanoscale roughness by far, 11–14 which is applied to aerospace, precision optics and information technology field, and so on 15 . Nevertheless, CMP is affected by numerous parameters such as the type of abrasive, pressure on the workpiece as well as polishing pad, 16 and the morphology, size, physical, and chemical properties of abrasive are considered to be one of the most crucial factors affecting the surface quality 17,18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%