2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of ankle-foot orthosis stiffness on walking performance in individuals with lower-limb impairments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, modulating IDEO strut stiffness by up to 40% in the present study yielded few significant biomechanical effects during uphill walking. These results are consistent with our previously published results from overground walking [12,20] but it was expected that due to the greater contribution of the plantarflexors and the greater dorsiflexion range of motion during uphill walking lower extremity mechanics would be affected to a greater extent by strut stiffness. The primary kinematic difference among strut stiffnesses was that the knee of the IDEO limb contacted the ground in a more extended position in the two more compliant struts.…”
Section: Comparisons Among Strutssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, modulating IDEO strut stiffness by up to 40% in the present study yielded few significant biomechanical effects during uphill walking. These results are consistent with our previously published results from overground walking [12,20] but it was expected that due to the greater contribution of the plantarflexors and the greater dorsiflexion range of motion during uphill walking lower extremity mechanics would be affected to a greater extent by strut stiffness. The primary kinematic difference among strut stiffnesses was that the knee of the IDEO limb contacted the ground in a more extended position in the two more compliant struts.…”
Section: Comparisons Among Strutssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The IDEO users accomplished the uphill walking task despite deviations in their lower extremity mechanics. Consistent with existing level ground walking literature [7,12,20,26], AFO use limited ankle ROM, which resulted in 77% less ankle power generation at push-off. Previous investigators have found between 42% [26] and 80% [8] less power generation than controls while using carbon fiber AFOs.…”
Section: Comparisons To Controlssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…72 Optional therapies that include sports medicine-based interventions utilizing a dynamic AFO (e.g., the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis) are available to LS patients. Such devices are designed to improve functional performance on tasks such as walking, changing directions, sit-to-stand, and ascending stairs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%