1977
DOI: 10.1086/154970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of autoionization accompanied by excitation on dielectronic recombination and ionization equilibrium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
121
4

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
121
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, this procedure gives results that are in fair agreement with our present calculations, but, as is seen for higher ionization stages, this method fails to account correctly for low-temperature DR. The results of Mewe et al (1980), on the other hand, were obtained using a parameterized empirical formula based upon the renormalized results of Jacobs et al (1977) and Ansari et al (1970) for 3p → 3d, 3p → 4s, and (2006); ( §) extrapolated along the isoelectronic sequence; ( ) dominant excitation threshold -see Table 2; (d) single configuration TDCHF results of Ghosh & Mukherjee (1997).…”
Section: Dr Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, this procedure gives results that are in fair agreement with our present calculations, but, as is seen for higher ionization stages, this method fails to account correctly for low-temperature DR. The results of Mewe et al (1980), on the other hand, were obtained using a parameterized empirical formula based upon the renormalized results of Jacobs et al (1977) and Ansari et al (1970) for 3p → 3d, 3p → 4s, and (2006); ( §) extrapolated along the isoelectronic sequence; ( ) dominant excitation threshold -see Table 2; (d) single configuration TDCHF results of Ghosh & Mukherjee (1997).…”
Section: Dr Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both MCBP results are somewhat Mazzotta et al (1998); (c) green solid curve, LS results of Jacobs & Davis (1983); red dashed curve, present MCBP results. On the right is Fe ix: black dots with error bars, TSR experiment by Schmidt et al (2008); (a) red solid curve, empirical results of Mewe et al (1980); (b) blue solid curve, compilation of Arnaud & Raymond (1992); (c) black solid curve, result of Jacobs et al (1977); (d) green solid curve, empirical data of Kato & Asano (1999); (e) black dash-dotted curve, empirical formula of Hahn (1991); (f) "4CF" and "5CF" MCBP results of Badnell (2006); red dashed curve, present "18CF" MCBP results; The present RR results are also shown as the long-dashed curve.…”
Section: Dr Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fitted parameters are listed in Table 1, which should enable fast evaluation of DR rate coefficients in plasma models. The existing DR rate coefficients of Na-like ions, widely used in coronal ionization balance calculations, are mostly based on the work of Jacobs et al (1977Jacobs et al ( , 1979 and modifications of Zhdanov (1982) and Dube & LaGatutta (1987) for the 2p ! 3l 0 nl 00 inner-shell excitation channels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We checked that the calculated rates summed over n ≥ 2 and l, added to the rate of the 1s 2 (ground level) level, are similar to the total RR rates calculated by Arnaud & Rothenflug (1985), Pequignot et al (1991), Mazzotta et al (1998), Jacobs et al (1977) (for He-like Fe ion) and Nahar (1999) (for O vii). Since these authors used hydrogenic formulae, the RR rate coefficient depends on which screening value was used.…”
Section: Radiative Recombination (Rr) Coefficients Ratesmentioning
confidence: 96%