1994
DOI: 10.1080/00221589.1994.11516546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of autumn temperature on flowering time and cropping ofPyrus communiscv. Conference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The year-to-year variation and differences among cultivars seem to indicate that there is a strong influence of climatic conditions and genotype on sweet cherry fruit set, as has been found in other studies (Choi and Andersen, 2001) and in different fruit species such as pear (Atkinson and Taylor, 1994;Atkinson and Lucas, 1996) or apricot (Alburquerque et al, 2004;Ruiz and Egea, 2008).…”
Section: Total Number Of Flowers Per Node and Fruit Setmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The year-to-year variation and differences among cultivars seem to indicate that there is a strong influence of climatic conditions and genotype on sweet cherry fruit set, as has been found in other studies (Choi and Andersen, 2001) and in different fruit species such as pear (Atkinson and Taylor, 1994;Atkinson and Lucas, 1996) or apricot (Alburquerque et al, 2004;Ruiz and Egea, 2008).…”
Section: Total Number Of Flowers Per Node and Fruit Setmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…PLANT MATERIAL. Six 18-year-old 'Agua de Aranjuez,ʼ pear trees grafted on 'EMʼ quince rootstock and grown under standard Apples and pears are fruit crops particularly susceptible to cropping irregularity (Atkinson and Taylor, 1994;Beattie and Folley, 1977;Browning and Miller, 1992;Jackson and Hamer, 1980). Analyzing fruit set determinants in apple, Williams (1970) could demonstrate a strong relationship between the effectiveness of fl owers to set fruit following delayed pollinations and general orchard performance suggesting that cropping variability among different sites could therefore be explained in terms of differences in fl ower receptivity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same 391 relative change was observed between Bergerac and Nîmes (Table 5) For pear tree cultivars, we may suppose that abrupt change of flowering dates is 443 explainable in the same way as for apple tree 'Golden Delicious'. However, higher mean 444 advances in flowering dates for pear tree cultivars in same locations and periods suggest that 445 climate warming exerted a lower effect on the lengthening of dormancy in the case of pear 446 trees, due to their lower chilling requirements (Atkinson and Taylor, 1994). …”
Section: Statistical Models 123mentioning
confidence: 99%