2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of beverages on the stimulation and viscoelasticity of saliva: Relationship to mouthfeel?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, saliva is stimulated in response to both chemical and mechanical stimuli arising during oral processing, which in itself has been shown to affect sensory properties of beverages [16].…”
Section: Dynamics Of Sensory Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, saliva is stimulated in response to both chemical and mechanical stimuli arising during oral processing, which in itself has been shown to affect sensory properties of beverages [16].…”
Section: Dynamics Of Sensory Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasise that the analysis of the food structures during oral processing is complicated by the concomitant change in particle size, the multiple actions of saliva, and individual differences in oral physiology including saliva's rheology, flow rate and composition [16], chewing behaviour and oral processing time [11].…”
Section: Dynamics Of Sensory Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( Davies et al, 2009). Therefore, increased flow rate could conceivably affect the levels of certain salivary substances.…”
Section: Effect Of Drinking a Glass Of Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) is known to induce gelation of MUC5AC and MUC2 gastrointestinal mucins [23]. Previously it was shown that EGCG impacts rheology [24], lubrication [7] and interfacial elasticity [5,25] of mucin. However these studies of physical characterisation were mainly performed using saliva rather than gastrointestinal mucus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%