2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of breast cancer subtypes on axillary ultrasound accuracy: A retrospective single center analysis of 583 women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our data indicated that false negative patients were more likely to occur in younger than 50 years old, Ki-67 high expression (> 20%), larger primary tumor size (> 2 cm) and higher histological grade, which was consistent with the results of Yan' na Zhang and other studies [27]. Therefore, in the high-risk subgroups that can lead to high false negative rate, we should carefully consider the results of ultrasound, and combine other examination methods, such as various kinds of tumor puncture biopsy, to improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In addition, our data indicated that false negative patients were more likely to occur in younger than 50 years old, Ki-67 high expression (> 20%), larger primary tumor size (> 2 cm) and higher histological grade, which was consistent with the results of Yan' na Zhang and other studies [27]. Therefore, in the high-risk subgroups that can lead to high false negative rate, we should carefully consider the results of ultrasound, and combine other examination methods, such as various kinds of tumor puncture biopsy, to improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As palpation is inaccurate (29), AUS is performed to provide more relevant information. AUS alone has a reported sensitivity of 39-60%, specificity of 90-96%, PPV of 80-91%, and NPV of 75-83% (6,30,31). This implied that despite of an acceptable specificity above 90%, prior to surgery about 40-60% of nodal metastases cannot be found by AUS and about 20-25% of patients with a negative AUS have been assessed as modal metastases after surgery.…”
Section: P-values Were Calculated By Using χ 2 Test or Wilcoxon Rank-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sensitivity of US (71%) for prediction of residual nodal metastatic disease was higher than that of clinical examination and MRI/ PET in most studies [139]. Limited data have suggested that the sensitivity of axillary US is higher for some subtypes such as triple negative breast cancer (69%) and HER2 positive breast cancer (71%) [140,141].…”
Section: Us Axillamentioning
confidence: 97%