2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of business strategy on annual report readability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
145
0
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
7
145
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Bentley et al () found that prospectors are more likely to experience financial reporting irregularities and have weak internal controls than are defenders. Lim et al () demonstrated that prospectors exhibit poor annual report readability and evident negative and uncertain tones. In this section, we examine the moderating effect of earnings management on the relation between business strategy and environmental protection.…”
Section: Cross‐sectional Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bentley et al () found that prospectors are more likely to experience financial reporting irregularities and have weak internal controls than are defenders. Lim et al () demonstrated that prospectors exhibit poor annual report readability and evident negative and uncertain tones. In this section, we examine the moderating effect of earnings management on the relation between business strategy and environmental protection.…”
Section: Cross‐sectional Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it adds to the growing literature on the effect of business strategy on firms' investment decisions, especially for investments in intangible assets such as CSR. Previous works focused on impacts of business strategy on firm per se or accounting issues, such as firm performance (Hambrick, ), CEO compensation (Ittner, Larcker, & Rajan, ), financial reporting irregularities and audit efforts (Bentley, Omer, & Sharp, ), auditor reporting (Chen et al, ), annual report readability (Lim, Chalmers, & Hanlon, ), and tax aggressiveness (Higgins et al, ). Our study emphasizes the effect of business strategy on long‐term investment in intangible assets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some current studies use also Fog index (Lo et al, 2017;Lim et al, 2018), we detected also application of FRE readability measure (Moffitt & Burns, 2009), texture index (Sydserff & Weetman, 1999, p. 475), Cloze procedure (Adelberg, 1979;Smith & Taffler, 1992), Lix (Smith & Taffler, 1992), Flesch Fog, Lix (Courtis, 1995), the Gunning measure of readability (Heath & Phelps, 1984), C-Test, the MIT test and the The Science Virtual Test SVT test (Jones & Smith, 2014). However, further based on the basic predictions of the readability theories, researchers began to raise questions on why variability in readability occurs?…”
Section: Readability and Obfuscation Research In Accountingmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…A FOG higher than 18 suggests the text is virtually unreadable (Li, ). The FOG readability calculation tool has been successfully used in prior quantitative studies exploring financial disclosure obfuscation (Ajina et al, ; Chakrabarty et al, ; Lim, Chalmers, & Hanlon, ; Merkley, ) and has historically been a principal financial reporting readability measure (Bonsall, Leone, Miller, & Rennekamp, ). Following previous research (Cheung & Lau, ; Li, ), the FOG readability measure is computed for the text in each text file using the free and publicly available Lingua::EN::Fathom module in Perl code located at http://search.cpan.org/~kimryan/Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.19/.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%