Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-7763-8_101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Calibration and Acceptance Criteria on Crack Detection and Discrimination by Eddy Current Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results, used in [6], are listed in Table 1. [3] and Martin Marietta [7], using the same air-core probe as in 1984 [1]. Figure 3 shows computed magnitude and phase profiles for rectangular and semi-elliptical fatigue crack models.…”
Section: Uniform Interrogating Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results, used in [6], are listed in Table 1. [3] and Martin Marietta [7], using the same air-core probe as in 1984 [1]. Figure 3 shows computed magnitude and phase profiles for rectangular and semi-elliptical fatigue crack models.…”
Section: Uniform Interrogating Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 29/29 method 4 was among the first attempts to quantify the POD. It counts the number of damages detected n and divides it by the total number of inspected damages n tot to obtain an estimate for the POD = n / n tot .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%