2008
DOI: 10.1002/adem.200800128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Cell Shape Anisotropy on the Tensile Behavior of Open Cell Aluminum Foam

Abstract: There are numerous processes for the fabrication of openand closed cell metal foams and some of these methods result in a strong anisotropy in cell shape. The mechanical properties of these specific foams, such as the stiffness, yield stress and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) (see Fig. 1), also show anisotropy which is often linked to the cell shape. [1,2,3,4,5] Gibson and Ashby (G&A) constructed an analytical beam bending model to calculate the influence of the cell aspect ratio, i.e. the long cell axis divi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation that the peak stress in RD is larger and peak strain is lower compared to TD is consistent with a number of experimental observations (Banhart and Baumeister, 1998;Dillard et al, 2006;Amsterdam et al, 2008d). In RD, we found an early damage onset and higher damage accumulation rate, owing to the decreased critical curvature and increased rate of curvature development at the triple points.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation that the peak stress in RD is larger and peak strain is lower compared to TD is consistent with a number of experimental observations (Banhart and Baumeister, 1998;Dillard et al, 2006;Amsterdam et al, 2008d). In RD, we found an early damage onset and higher damage accumulation rate, owing to the decreased critical curvature and increased rate of curvature development at the triple points.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In tension, the redistribution of active strain regions is attributed to the local hardening caused by the stretching of cell walls (Motz and Pippan, 2001). The relative distribution of the material in the plateau borders and cell wall (Warren and Kraynik, 1987;Harders et al, 2005;Al-Hasani, 2002, 2001;Gong et al, 2005) and the anisotropy in cell shape also have a strong influence on the elasto-plastic properties of foams (Silva et al, 1995;McCullough et al, 1999;Nieh et al, 2000;Amsterdam et al, 2008d). Clearly, the mesoscopic structure introduces a characteristic length scale (the cell size), which becomes important especially when dealing with structures having dimensions on the order of the cell size or in case of inhomogeneous deformation at localization bands, cracks, notches or holes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting, indeed, that the model does not account properly neither for the stochastic nature of local morphology, nor for anisotropy effects that have been often observed in porous systems [51][52][53]. Nevertheless, the modeling approach followed here allows relating the mechanical properties to the different characteristic lengths associated with the microstructural features of NP metal foams.…”
Section: Comparison Between Experimental Data and Model Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The popularity of macrofoams, i.e., porous materials where pore size is above the scale of tens of microns, stems from the intersection of a variety of desirable properties in industry. For example, aluminum macrofoam boasts of a high stiffness-to-density ratio, high capacity for energy absorption during compression, high-temperature resistance, electrical and thermal conductivities, good machinability, and cheap production costs [20][21][22][23][24][25], see Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%