The influence of competing regional stress regimes on the generation of hydraulic fracturing-induced microseismicity

Salvage, Rebecca O.; Jia, Suzie Qing; Eaton, David W.

doi:10.1190/segam2020-3419416.1

Cited by 1 publication

(6 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…2a; Visser et al, 2020) compared to 2020 (Fig. 2b; Salvage et al, 2021). We are unable to compare the seismicity from 2019 since these data are not yet published.…”

Section: Covid-19 and The Reduction Of Noise Globallymentioning

confidence: 89%

“…Events within this precursory sequence had magnitudes between M L 0.2 and M L 2.6 and were all located at depths of approximately 2.05 km. Moment tensor results for the M L 3.1 event suggest a focal mechanism dominated by strike-slip (Salvage et al, 2021).…”

Section: Pre and Post-lockdown: 2020mentioning

confidence: 90%

“…3a) since different methods were used in their magnitude calculations (Hutton andBoore, 1987 vs. Babaie-Mahani and. The lowering of M c between these years is fundamentally related to an increase in the monitoring capacity and detectability of small seismic events within the KSMMA (Salvage et al, 2021). The estimated b value (Gutenberg and Richter, 1944) of 1.96 (Fig.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Observed Seismicitymentioning

confidence: 96%

“…The sites of the accelerometers were chosen due to their proximity to the most recent seismicity in the area, in particular a number of felt events that have occurred close to Tower Lake and Farmington. Further details of the installation of this array can be found in Salvage et al (2021).…”

Section: Covid-19 and The Reduction Of Noise Globallymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…By converting the waveforms into over 250 features (e.g. frequency content, P-S timings), machine learning enabled the association of such features with P and S phases (or, conversely, with noise), allowing accurate automatic phase picking of detected events (Salvage et al, 2021). We take the catalogue of event times and P and S phases to cut waveforms from the continuous seismic data.…”

Section: Covid-19 and The Reduction Of Noise Globallymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Unprecedented quiescence in resource development area allows detection of long-lived latent seismicity

Salvage

Eaton

2021

Solid Earth

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Recent seismicity in Alberta and north-east British Columbia has been attributed to ongoing oil and gas development in the area, due to its temporal and spatial correlation. Prior to such development, the area was seismically quiescent. Here, we show evidence that latent seismicity may occur in areas where previous operations have occurred, even during a shutdown in operations. The global COVID-19 pandemic furnished the unique opportunity to study seismicity during a long period of anthropogenic quiescence. Within the Kiskatinaw area of British Columbia, 389 events were detected from April to August 2020, which encompasses a period with very little hydraulic fracturing operations. This reduction in operations was the result of a government-imposed lockdown severely restricting the movement of people as well as a downturn in the economic market causing industry stock prices to collapse. Except for a reduction in the seismicity rate and a lack of temporal clustering that is often characteristic of hydraulic fracturing induced sequences, the general characteristics of the observed seismicity were similar to the preceding time period of active operations. During the period of relative quiescence, event magnitudes were observed between ML −0.7 and ML 1.2, which is consistent with previous event magnitudes in the area. Hypocentres occurred in a corridor orientated NW–SE, just as seismicity had done in previous years, and were located at depths associated with the target Montney formation or shallower (<2.5 km). A maximum of 21 % of the detected events during lockdown may be attributable to natural seismicity, with a further 8 % potentially attributed to dynamic triggering of seismicity from teleseismic events and 6 % related to ongoing saltwater disposal and a single operational well pad. However, this leaves ∼65 % of the seismicity detected during lockdown being unattributable to primary activation mechanisms. This seismicity is unlikely to be the result of direct pore pressure increases (as very little direct injection of fluids was occurring at the time) and we see no patterns of temporal or spatial migration in the seismicity as would be expected from direct pore pressure increases. Instead, we suggest that this latent seismicity may be generated by aseismic slip as fluids (resulting from previous hydraulic fracturing injection) become trapped within permeable formations at depth, keeping pore pressures in the area elevated and consequently allowing the generation of seismicity. Alternatively, this seismicity may be the result of fault and fracture weakening in response to previous fluid injection. This is the first time that this latent seismicity has been observed in this area of British Columbia and, as such, this may now represent the new normal background seismicity rate within the Kiskatinaw area.

show abstract

“…2a; Visser et al, 2020) compared to 2020 (Fig. 2b; Salvage et al, 2021). We are unable to compare the seismicity from 2019 since these data are not yet published.…”

Section: Covid-19 and The Reduction Of Noise Globallymentioning

confidence: 89%

Section: Pre and Post-lockdown: 2020mentioning

confidence: 90%