1987
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198706000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Continuous Epidural Bupivacaine Analgesia on the Second Stage of Labor and Method of Delivery in Nulliparous Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
28
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that, when using a low dose infusion technique combining both local anaesthetic and opioid, it is not necessary to withhold epidural analgesia during the second stage of labour, sometimes advocated to prevent prolongation of labour [8]. Our results, however, concur with those of Elliott [Ill, who failed to demonstrate an effect on spontaneous delivery rates and neonatal outcome when epidural infusion analgesia was continued into the second stage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This suggests that, when using a low dose infusion technique combining both local anaesthetic and opioid, it is not necessary to withhold epidural analgesia during the second stage of labour, sometimes advocated to prevent prolongation of labour [8]. Our results, however, concur with those of Elliott [Ill, who failed to demonstrate an effect on spontaneous delivery rates and neonatal outcome when epidural infusion analgesia was continued into the second stage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…APGAR score at 1 minute was 8 in 94% cases and APGAR at 5 minutes was 10 in 94% of cases. The result of the present study was similar to the studies conducted by Alberts et al 16 and Chestnut et al 17 …”
Section: Labour Pain Affects Almost All Systems In the Bodysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This study has addressed two issues: firstly, is it safe for the mother to stand and walk with regional blockade and secondly, does it have a positive impact on the progress of labour by shortening the duration of labour and reducing the incidence of instrumental delivery [7,8]? There have now been studies that have shown that reducing motor block per se, long blamed for increasing instrumental delivery rates associated with regional analgesia in labour, does not improve the outcome of labour [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%