The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: Some empirical evidence

Abstract

This paper shows that cultural identity may have considerable influence on the WTP to protect natural resources. The Basque Country, the region with the highest ethnic homogeneity in Europe, serves as an example to illustrate how important this issue can be in the environmental valuation of natural resources. The rationale for this influence may be found in the deep roots of the Basque culture, a culture where amalurra (mother Earth), i.e. the natural environment, has a central role, as studies from diverse disciplines such as anthropology, psychology and political science have shown.Simulated full distribution of the WTP to protect a Basque natural area using a random parameter logit model reveals that mean marginal WTP to protect its environmental attributes is approximately 60% higher if the cultural identity of the respondent is Basque. To our knowledge, this is the first application to show the influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources. Our findings have some methodological and policy implications. On the one hand, failure to take into account cultural identitary issues could result in significantly biased results in benefit transfer applications. On the other hand, policies aimed at conservation natural resources should consider the cultural context in which they will be implemented.

A Review of the Elements of Human Well-Being with an Emphasis on the Contribution of Ecosystem Services

“…The methods described include direct and indirect methods, applying both observed behavior and hypothetical markets. Numerous economists and ecologists have tried to embrace aspects of ecosystem services within more traditional economic methods-cost-benefit ratios, economics of choice, contingent valuation, return on investment, discount rates and willingness to pay, valuation of non-market goods, attribute-based choice, production function, equity, credits, benefits-based transfer functions, and modeling (Englin et al 1997;Chichilnisky and Heal 1998;Boyd et al 2001;Chambers and Whitehead 2003;Poudyal et al 2003;Ackerman et al 2007;Fisher and Erickson 2007;Boyd 2008;Arana and Leon 2009;Bond et al 2009;Colombo et al 2009;Hoyos et al 2009). Some economists believe the pricing structure for valuing ecosystems and their services are simply limited or wrong (Boyd and Banzhaf 2007;Boyd 2008).…”

The Determinant Factors of Travelers’ Choices for Pro-Environment Behavioral Intention-Integration Theory of Planned Behavior, Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology 2 and Sustainability Values

“…Consideration of these variables has had unexpectedly successful results towards predicting pro-environmental behaviors [8,10,11]. The encouragement of greater pro-environmental engagement in order to meet environmental responsibility means that sociologists and psychologists must determine various psychosocial approaches to clarify environmental behavior [11].…”

“…As such, travel-industry researchers and practitioners have begun to turn their attentions to other psychosocial constructs such as attitudes, beliefs, and values to meet their various responsibilities and customer expectations. These metrics have turned out to be more compatible in predicting pro-environmental behaviors [8][9][10].…”

Decision Support in Assessing the Sustainable Use of Forests and Other Natural Resources - A Comparative Review

“…Although monetary valuation can be the only decision-making method, it is often used as an input to other methods (mainly CBA). Monetary valuation has been used, for example, to assess forest certification [65], eco-labeling [66,67], conservation [68][69][70] and recreational use [71][72][73][74][75], to value biodiversity [76,77], assess recreational uses such as hunting and game management [78,79] evaluate scenic beauty [80] and understand land use planning [81].…”