2022
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of demographic and meteorological factors on temporal patterns of rotavirus infection in Dhaka, Bangladesh

Abstract: To quantify the potential impact of rotavirus vaccines and identify strategies to improve vaccine performance in Bangladesh, a better understanding of the drivers of pre-vaccination rotavirus patterns is required. We developed and fitted mathematical models to 23 years (1990–2012) of weekly rotavirus surveillance data from Dhaka with and without incorporating long-term and seasonal variation in the birth rate and meteorological factors. We performed external model validation using data between 2013 and 2019 fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of genotypes differed between countries that had implemented rotavirus vaccination and those that had not. In comparison to nations without rotavirus vaccine introduction, the occurrence of G1P [8] was lower in African and European countries that had adopted the vaccine. 9 Rotavirus infection shows a distinctive seasonal pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The distribution of genotypes differed between countries that had implemented rotavirus vaccination and those that had not. In comparison to nations without rotavirus vaccine introduction, the occurrence of G1P [8] was lower in African and European countries that had adopted the vaccine. 9 Rotavirus infection shows a distinctive seasonal pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Changing pattern of genotypic distribution of rotavirus genotypes was observed over the study period (Figure 2). In 2017, G1P [8] was the most prevalent genotype, but it gradually decreased and remained as the second most prominent genotype between 2018 and 2020. In contrast, G3P [8] was the second most prevailing genotype in 2017 but gradually became the most prominent genotype during 2018-2020.…”
Section: Distribution Of G and P Genotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations