1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00286-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of diabetes mellitus on acute and late clinical outcomes following coronary stent implantation

Abstract: We studied 954 consecutive patients with native coronary artery lesions treated with elective Palmaz-Schatz stents implantation using conventional coronary angiographic and intravascular ultrasound methodology. Procedural success, major in-hospital complications, and 1-year clinical outcome were compared according to the diabetic status. RESULTS. In-hospital mortality was 2% in IDDM, significantly higher (p <0.02) compared with non-IDDM (0%) and nondiabetics (0.3%). Stent thrombosis did not differ among groups… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
194
2
19

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 425 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
194
2
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to PTCA, coronary stent implantation has been demonstrated to reduce restenosis and the subsequent requirement for revascularization for patients with a relatively narrow spectrum of coronary lesions (12,13). Although stents appear to achieve a reduction in restenosis compared to PTCA in diabetic patients (32), even with stents, diabetic patients appear to have increased restenosis when compared with nondiabetic patients (33,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to PTCA, coronary stent implantation has been demonstrated to reduce restenosis and the subsequent requirement for revascularization for patients with a relatively narrow spectrum of coronary lesions (12,13). Although stents appear to achieve a reduction in restenosis compared to PTCA in diabetic patients (32), even with stents, diabetic patients appear to have increased restenosis when compared with nondiabetic patients (33,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from a consecutive series of patients like ours and randomized trials confirm the superiority of stents to balloon PTCA, both in the hospital and late followup outcomes. In the presence of some high-risk subgroups of patients, such as those with diabetes [20][21] , unstable angina 7 , acute myocardial infarction [15][16][17][18][19] , vessels with reference size <3.0mm 7 , balloon PTCA failures 6 , lesions located in he proximal left anterior descending artery 7,22 , chronic occlusions [13][14] , vein grafts 11 , restenotic lesions 12 and multivessel coronary disease 23 , who undergo percutaneous coronary revascularization, stents will promote better results and should be the technique of first choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42][43][44] Studies further demonstrated that stenting of the treated vessel does not offer full protection from restenosis and coronary events. 42,43 Even with the recent development of sirolimus-coated stents, it is not yet clear if diabetic subjects will fully benefit from this novel therapy.…”
Section: Diabetes and The Problem Of Restenosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42][43][44] Studies further demonstrated that stenting of the treated vessel does not offer full protection from restenosis and coronary events. 42,43 Even with the recent development of sirolimus-coated stents, it is not yet clear if diabetic subjects will fully benefit from this novel therapy. [45][46][47] To dissect the biochemical and molecular events linked to enhanced restenosis in diabetic human subjects, it was first necessary to establish animal models to readily address these concepts.…”
Section: Diabetes and The Problem Of Restenosismentioning
confidence: 99%