The influence of dicarboxylic acids: Oxalic acid and tartaric acid on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cements

Permana, Ahmadi Jaya; Setyawati, Harsasi; Hamami,; Murwani, Irmina Kris

doi:10.1063/1.4943317

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The gelation occurs due to excessive intermolecular hydrogen bonding. The liquid also contains tartaric acid that controls the setting characteristics [ 83 ]. GICs comprise an aluminosilicate network which is the three-dimensional structure.…”

Section: Structure and Composition Of Conventional Gicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Nanostructures on the Properties of Glass Ionomer Dental Restoratives/Cements: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Overall perspective of nanotechnology and reinforcement of dental biomaterials by nanoparticles has been reported in the literature. However, the literature regarding the reinforcement of dental biomaterials after incorporating various nanostructures is sparse. The present review addresses current developments of glass ionomer cements (GICs) after incorporating various metallic, polymeric, inorganic and carbon-based nanostructures. In addition, types, applications, and implications of various nanostructures incorporated in GICs are discussed. Most of the attempts by researchers are based on the laboratory-based studies; hence, it warrants long-term clinical trials to aid the development of suitable materials for the load bearing posterior dentition. Nevertheless, a few meaningful conclusions are drawn from this substantial piece of work; they are as follows: (1) most of the nanostructures are likely to enhance the mechanical strength of GICs; (2) certain nanostructures improve the antibacterial activity of GICs against the cariogenic bacteria; (3) clinical translation of these promising outcomes are completely missing, and (4) the nanostructured modified GICs could perform better than their conventional counterparts in the load bearing posterior dentition.

show abstract

Section: Structure and Composition Of Conventional Gicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Nanostructures on the Properties of Glass Ionomer Dental Restoratives/Cements: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A study conducted by Ahmadi Jaya Permana et al found that addition of tartaric acid enhanced compressive strength of GIC and quoted similar reasons for it. 22 On assessing microleakage, it was found that NSF resin coat had the best results in the present study. However, the difference between G Coat plus group and NSF resin coat group was not statistically significant.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 46%

“…Researchers claim that AgNPs are more potent in having bactericidal and bacteriostatic action than silica nano particles present in G Coat Plus. 22 The indigenious product used in the present study has additive antibacterial and fluoride releasing property. Application of nano silver fluoride resin coat will aid in halting the initiation secondary caries in the restored teeth by having an anti-plaque action.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Comparative evaluation of surface microhardness and microleakage after application of commercially available G-Coat Plus, nano silver fluoride resin coat and petroleum jelly over glass ionomer cement restoration: an in vitro study

Deulkar,

Rathi,

Thosar

et al. 2024

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Glass ionomer cement (GIC) is a widely used tooth coloured material. However, GIC holds certain undesirable properties. In order to overcoming the major drawback of moisture sensitivity, surface coatings like petroleum jelly, varnish are applied over GIC restoration. Thus, the present study was planned to compare efficacy of newly formulated nano silver fluoride resin coat with G Coat Plus and petroleum jelly on microhardness and microleakage of Type IX GIC. Methods Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of thirty-six non carious premolars and restored with type IX GIC. The restored teeth were divided into 3 groups: Petroleum gel, G Coat plus and Nano silver fluoride resin coat. Protective surface coatings were applied over the restorations, dried for 2 minutes and thermocycled. Teeth were then placed in 1% methylene blue for 24 hours. Longitudinally sections were prepared and were observed under stereomicroscope at 25x magnification for dye penetration. Forty-five blocks of PVC were prepared and restored with GIC. Samples were divided into three groups equally as mentioned earlier and a layer of each coating was applied on all samples according to the groups and dried for 2 minutes. Further, surface microhardness (SMH) of the samples was tested by Vickers microhardness machine under a load of 50 grams for 10 seconds at 3 sites and a mean was calculated. Statistical analysis was conducted using post hoc and one way-ANOVA tests. Results The microleakage scores of three groups were statistically insignificant. The mean microhardness of all samples in the three groups showed no statistically significant difference. The mean surface microhardness of group 1 was 66.44±4.57 whereas for group 2 and group 3 it was 76.15±3.02 and 79.22±4.03 respectively. Conclusions The novel agent containing nano silver fluoride is showed superior results and is intended to augment the properties of GIC.

show abstract

“…In another study Permana et al demonstrated the effects of dicarboxylic acids such as tartaric acid and oxalic acid on the compressive strength of GIC. 86 The study reported an optimum compressive strength for GIC in the presence of 10% (w/w) of both the dicarboxylic acids. However, compared to oxalic acid containing GIC, significant enhancement in compression strength was seen in tartaric acid added GIC.…”

Section: Materials Advances Reviewmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Different studies showed that the acidic chelating agents have multiple advantages. Commonly used chelating agents are tartaric acid, 86,87 oxalic acids, 88 phosphoric acid and citric acids. 89 Stereochemistry of tartaric acid plays a major role in the chelation process.…”

Section: Effects Of Additives In Polyalkenoic Acid In Improving the P...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Modifications of polyalkenoic acid and its effect on glass ionomer cement

Sasidharan Lathikumari,

Saraswathy

2024

Mater. Adv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The influence of dicarboxylic acids: Oxalic acid and tartaric acid on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cements

Cited by 3 publications

References 7 publications

Effect of Nanostructures on the Properties of Glass Ionomer Dental Restoratives/Cements: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Effect of Nanostructures on the Properties of Glass Ionomer Dental Restoratives/Cements: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Comparative evaluation of surface microhardness and microleakage after application of commercially available G-Coat Plus, nano silver fluoride resin coat and petroleum jelly over glass ionomer cement restoration: an in vitro study

Modifications of polyalkenoic acid and its effect on glass ionomer cement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About