2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of differential sedimentary loading and compaction on the development of a deltaic rollover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that many processes that promote the development of deformations and shifts in topography, engendering changes in accommodation rates that are not directly related to geotectonics, such as halokinesis (e.g., Rojo et al 2020), sedimentary compaction (e.g., Khani and Back 2015), and glacio-isostatic adjustment (e.g., Dietrich et al 2018).…”
Section: Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that many processes that promote the development of deformations and shifts in topography, engendering changes in accommodation rates that are not directly related to geotectonics, such as halokinesis (e.g., Rojo et al 2020), sedimentary compaction (e.g., Khani and Back 2015), and glacio-isostatic adjustment (e.g., Dietrich et al 2018).…”
Section: Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the thickest part of Hardangerfjord delta is located in the hanging wall of F3 ( Fig. 8) and that F3, in addition to a relatively small portion of ØFS5, are the only faults reactivated after the ~70 myr period of inactivity between Late syn-RP1 (?Early Triassic) and syn-RP2 (Middle Jurassic), together suggest that the reactivation of F3 might be triggered by differential sedimentary loading (Fazlikhani & Back, 2015) associated with westward progradation of the Hardangerfjord delta. However, a combination of sedimentary loading and crustal extension during syn-RP2 might also explain the reactivation of F3.…”
Section: A and 6b)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…50 myr period of inactivity between Late syn‐RP1 (Early Triassic) and syn‐RP2 (Middle Jurassic). Reactivation of F3 might be triggered by differential sedimentary loading (Fazlikhani & Back, 2015) associated with westward progradation of the Hardangerfjord Delta. However, a combination of sedimentary loading and crustal extension during syn‐RP2 might also explain the reactivation of F3.…”
Section: Structural and Stratigraphic Framework Of The Stord Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A var ied thick ness of pro gres sively com pact ing se quences ex erts a first-or der con trol on re cent sub si dence, for ex am ple, in the coastal area of the Neth er lands (Kooi, 2000), as well as on the de vel op ment of the Late Ce nozoic Niger delta (Fazli Khani and Back, 2015). Gvirtzman (2001) de ter mined a de pend ence be tween spa tial vari abil ity of sed i ment thick ness and as so ci ated dif fer ence in amount of com pac tion-re lated sub si dence.…”
Section: Base Level Fall Tectonic Movements and Causes Of Differentimentioning
confidence: 99%