2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijex.2010.033412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of ejector component efficiencies on performance of Ejector Expander Refrigeration Cycle and exergy analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bilir and Ersoy [159,305] studied the performance improvement of EERS over the standard cycle using the R134a refrigerant: the COP was found to increase by 10.1-22.34%, and the reduction in exergy destruction was found to be up 58.7%. The COP improvement increases with T c .…”
Section: Ejector Expansion Refrigeration System (Eers)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bilir and Ersoy [159,305] studied the performance improvement of EERS over the standard cycle using the R134a refrigerant: the COP was found to increase by 10.1-22.34%, and the reduction in exergy destruction was found to be up 58.7%. The COP improvement increases with T c .…”
Section: Ejector Expansion Refrigeration System (Eers)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all theoretical and experimental studies conducted on ejector expander refrigeration/heat pump cycles, the performance coefficient has been shown to be higher than that in basic systems. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Recently, there has been increasing research on the transcritical carbon dioxide refrigeration cycle, because CO 2 has excellent thermodynamics and transport properties and it is an environmentally friendly refrigerant with zero ozone depleting potential and negligible (¼1) global warming potential. Carbon dioxide is a natural substance and does not have to be produced, especially as refrigerant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same operating temperature using a constant area ejector COP and its EER is higher than of the system using a constant pressure ejector as reported [13]. Bilir and Ersoy [14] also report on theoretical studies using R134a. In off-design conditions, the system shows higher COP values than conventional systems and by using COP constant area ejector can be increased by 22.3% depending on operating conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%