2003
DOI: 10.5395/jkacd.2003.28.6.475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of epinephrine concentration in local anesthetics on pulpal and gingival blood flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in agreement with the previous studies 7,8,19) . In a preliminary study for the present investigation, plain 2% lidocaine injection induced no change in PBF as in the control with saline.…”
Section: ⅳ Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is in agreement with the previous studies 7,8,19) . In a preliminary study for the present investigation, plain 2% lidocaine injection induced no change in PBF as in the control with saline.…”
Section: ⅳ Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In tooth grinding procedures, local anesthesia is usually used to control patient' s pain and discomfort. Many previous studies investigated the effect of epinephrine-containing local anesthetics on pulpal blood flow (PBF) [6][7][8] and the effect of cavity preparation on PBF 9,10) . However, few studies investigated on the effect of local anesthetics on cavity preparation-induced PBF change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In animal studies 27,28 after 3 months of loading of implants subjects were sacri ced. One of the researches (Mozzati et al 34 ) was made on partially edentulous mandibles in need of tooth extractions with immediate loading of 4 implants for fullarch rehabilitation. Degidi et al (2006) 33 didn't provide any information on the number of implants inserted in the maxilla and mandible separetely.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It induces vasoconstriction by binding to α1 receptor, and vasodilation by binding to β2 receptor. As α receptors predominate in oral mucosa, submucosa, and periodontium compared to β2 receptor, epinephrine mainly behaves as potent vasoconstrictor in the oral cavity 34,35,36…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%