2022
DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2022.2071183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of foreign institutional investors on audit fees: evidence from Chinese listed firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Institutional investors also reduce the misuse of firm's resources by reducing the managerial power and attenuating the relationship between executive pay gap and audit fees (Ge and Kim, 2020). Likewise, Li and Wang (2022) find that, in firms with poor earnings quality, qualified institutional investors enhance the firm value, by increasing monitoring through increased audit effort. Recent evidence also points out that the institutional investors encourage firms in emerging economies to utilize cash holdings or pay out excess cash to investors (Jacob and Lukose, 2018;Jeon et al, 2011), thus reducing the free cash flows under control of the insiders.…”
Section: Role Of Institutional Investorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Institutional investors also reduce the misuse of firm's resources by reducing the managerial power and attenuating the relationship between executive pay gap and audit fees (Ge and Kim, 2020). Likewise, Li and Wang (2022) find that, in firms with poor earnings quality, qualified institutional investors enhance the firm value, by increasing monitoring through increased audit effort. Recent evidence also points out that the institutional investors encourage firms in emerging economies to utilize cash holdings or pay out excess cash to investors (Jacob and Lukose, 2018;Jeon et al, 2011), thus reducing the free cash flows under control of the insiders.…”
Section: Role Of Institutional Investorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Institutional investors (such as pension funds and investment funds) have shown to be more environmentally concerned and are often the major source of long-term funding. These investors tend to have greater confidence in the quality of green finance products/ services provided in Hong Kong [86], due to the city's adoption of common law and transparent financial regulations on par with international practices [78,85]. Availability in the HKEX market of these green financial instruments could thus leverage private investment in the SCP, and meet its need for finance from a growing supply of green capital from large international institutional investors with a significant appetite for long-term investment in environmental assets and sustainable infrastructure [87].…”
Section: Green Index and Green Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, their active involvement in the board meetings restricts the directors to misstate or hide corporate information (Zeng et al, 2013). Lin et al (2009) reported that financial institutions empower the internal audit committee of the corporate board and compel the management to formulate aggressive corporate disclosure policies (Lin et al, 2018). Thus, the review of the literature suggests that litigation risk arises due to a number of governance failures in the firms such as financial statements misstatements, poor disclosure practices, earnings management, abnormal accruals, insider selling, and managerial opportunism (Dong and Zhang, 2019;Field et al, 2005;Houston et al, 2019).…”
Section: Litigation Risk Institutional Ownership and Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2013). Lin et al. (2009) reported that financial institutions empower the internal audit committee of the corporate board and compel the management to formulate aggressive corporate disclosure policies (Lin et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%