The data that support the findings of this study are publicly available from the sources noted in the text. CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENTThere is no conflict of interest to declare.

No abstract

No abstract

We investigate how community social capital, captured by the strength of cooperative norms and social networks within a geographical community, affects the internal structure of corporate boards. We find that firms headquartered in high-social-capital US counties have a more advising-intensive board structure, as they are more likely to set up specialised advisory committees and appoint more advisory directors. These findings are robust to endogeneity concerns and a battery of sensitivity tests. Our mediation analysis shows that the increased board advising intensity, induced by community social capital, reduces investment inefficiency. We further reveal that community social capital reduces board monitoring intensity and directors' monitoring efforts. Overall, our results are consistent with the argument that community social capital serves as a societal monitoring mechanism to reduce firms' need for board monitoring and, hence, firms' boards located in high-socialcapital communities focus more on advising.

No abstract