1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-8502(98)00034-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of fuel additives on the formation of carbon during combustion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 3, the average fraction of total carbonaceous components for the excavators tested in this study is consistent with that for a marine engine, whereas the element fraction was lower than that for a marine engine (Sippula et al, 2014). Iron oxide is recognized as a catalyst and can promote soot burnout during combustion processes (Kasper et al, 1999). The EC fraction of PM in the excavator exhaust is higher than that reported by Sippula et al (2014), which might be the result of a lower metal fraction in the excavators used for their study.…”
Section: Average Chemical Composition Of Pm In Excavator Exhaustsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As shown in Table 3, the average fraction of total carbonaceous components for the excavators tested in this study is consistent with that for a marine engine, whereas the element fraction was lower than that for a marine engine (Sippula et al, 2014). Iron oxide is recognized as a catalyst and can promote soot burnout during combustion processes (Kasper et al, 1999). The EC fraction of PM in the excavator exhaust is higher than that reported by Sippula et al (2014), which might be the result of a lower metal fraction in the excavators used for their study.…”
Section: Average Chemical Composition Of Pm In Excavator Exhaustsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It is well known that Fe-based fuel additives such as ferrocene Fe(C 5 H 5 ) 2 or iron pentacarbonyl Fe(CO) 5 affect the combustion process by soot reduction (Kasper et al 1999;Zhang and Megaridis 1996;Skillas et al 2000). Most studies explain the reduction of particulate emission by a promotion of the soot oxidation process in the flame (Zhang and Megaridis 1996;Kasper et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies explain the reduction of particulate emission by a promotion of the soot oxidation process in the flame (Zhang and Megaridis 1996;Kasper et al 1999). Miller et al (2007) demonstrated a significant decrease in organic carbon (OC) that accounts for most of the decrease in total carbon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we briefly recall that energy cannot be generated but only be converted from essentially oxidising C-H and C-C bonds into CO 2 and water and if we contemplate of how well (really?) we understand the underlying heterogeneous [3][4][5] and homogeneous processes apart from islands of knowledge for example with internal combustion engines [6][7][8][9] for cars, then we see that there is still much room for generating knowledge leading to conceptual [10] improvement. Such science (electrochemistry, coal science [11][12][13][14], oil chemistry, solids combustion chemistry [15,16]) was popular in the first half of the 20th century but is not widely practiced now, possibly because of its high complexity and thus large phenomenological nature it took in its early days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%