The influence of grapevine rootstocks on scion growth and drought resistance

Zhang, Li; Marguerit, Elisa; Rossdeutsch, Landry; Ollat, Nathalie; Gambetta, Grégory A.

doi:10.1007/s40626-016-0070-x

Cited by 110 publications

(71 citation statements)

References 102 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Production per plant showed significant differences among rootstocks in the first (2015.1) and last production cycle (2018.2); however, in the mean value of the cycles, this effect was not significant (Table 1). The rootstock may affect grapevine yield because it affects different production components: bud fertility (number of bunches), fruit set, size and weight of the bunch and of the berry (Zhang et al, 2016). According to Bascunán-Godoy et al (2017), the increase in yield of 'Red Globe' on the rootstocks 'Harmony' and 'Salt Creek' was correlated with the increase in light capture, greater leaf area, photosynthetic rate, light absorption capacity, production and mobilization of reserve carbohydrates on these rootstocks.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Table 2, a significant reduction in the values of SS can be observed in the grapevines grafted on 'Harmony' compared to 'Freedom', 'IAC 313', 'IAC 572', and 'SO4'. The effect of the rootstock on chemical composition of the grape, especially SS and TA, show conflicting results in the literature, which vary in accordance with the rootstock and canopy combination, but they also depend on the effects of the rootstock on fruit production and development, which are affected by other factors, such as vineyard management and seasonal climate variations (Zhang et al, 2016).…”

Section: Rootstocksmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Rootstocks for the new seedless table grape ‘BRS Vitória’ under tropical semi-arid conditions of São Francisco Valley

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

‘BRS Vitoria’ is the most important Brazilian table grape cultivar in the domestic and foreign markets, standing out for the seedleness, pleasant flavor, high yield and mildew resistance. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of the rootstock on the yield, production components, vigor, and physical and chemical characteristics of the ‘BRS Vitória’ grape under irrigation in the Brazilian semi-arid region. The experiment was conducted over eight consecutive production cycles in the period from 2015 to 2018 in a commercial area in the Senador Nilo Coelho project, Petrolina, PE. The treatments were represented by seven rootstocks: ‘IAC 572’, ‘IAC 766’, ‘IAC 313’, ‘Harmony’, ‘SO4’, ‘Paulsen 1103’, and ‘Freedom’, using a randomized block experimental design with four replications. The results were variable among production cycles, with significant effects of the rootstock in some cycles and/or in the overall mean of the cycles. The variables of pruning weight, sprouting, bud fertility, and titratable acidity were not affected by the rootstock in any of the production cycles evaluated in this study. ‘Harmony’ rootstock promoted greater berry mass and diameter but reduced the soluble solids content. Vines of ‘BRS Vitória’ showed moderate vigor, high bud fertility and yield, satisfactory characteristics of bunch and berry, sugars and acids content that meet the requirements of the most demanding markets in all the rootstocks evaluated in this study.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Rootstocksmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rootstocks for the new seedless table grape ‘BRS Vitória’ under tropical semi-arid conditions of São Francisco Valley

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Whilethechoiceofscionvarietiesisoftenregulated by their performance in specific climatic conditions or marketing purposes (van Leeuwen and Seguin, 2006), rootstocks offer more flexible solutions for adapting the grafted plant to drought. A large variability in rootstock response to water deficit has beenreportedbyseveralauthors (Carbonneau,1985;Ollat et al, 2016 ;Zhang et al, 2016), although underlying mechanisms still need to be enlightened. Rootstocksparticipateintheregulationofplantwater balance through their own uptake capacities associated with root growth and water transport (Carbonneau, 1985 ;Bauerle et al, 2008 ;Alsina et al,2011;Peccoux,2011;Zhanget al,2016)orvia their effects on stomatal regulation (Lovisolo et al, 2010 ;Marguerit et al, 2012) and above ground development (Jones, 2012).…”

Section: Rootstocks: the Hidden Halfmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adapting plant material to face water stress in vineyards: which physiological targets for an optimal control of plant water status?

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims: Water scarcity, associated with climate change, is a particular threat to the sustainability of viticulture in present areas of cultivation, usually prone to drought. Breeding grapevine for reduced water use, better water extraction and maintained production (i.e., high water use efficiency) is therefore of major interest.Methods and results: This requires a comprehensive knowledge of the physiological impacts of drought on yield and quality. Attention should be paid to those mechanisms involved in the regulation of water status in plant tissues, as it is the primary parameter affected by drought. Transpiration rate, which has a major influence on plant water status, should therefore receive special attention in breeding programs. Beyond scions, the role of rootstocks, which have been largely introduced in vineyards, should be investigated further as it determines water extraction capacity and could modify water balance in grafted plants.Conclusion: Here we review recent advances in the characterization of genetic variability in the control of water use and water status, whether induced by rootstock or scion.Significance and impact of the study: This review should help scientists in choosing the relevant physiological targets in their research on grapevine tolerance to drought, whether for breeding prospects or new management practices.

show abstract

“…This rootstock-scion combination affects scion growth and development and vice versa and, in particular, the translocation of nutrients into the vegetative and generative plant organs (Medici et al, 2017). Furthermore, plant vigor, hormonal regulation, and long-distance signaling between various plant parts are influenced by the rootstock (Zhang et al, 2016). Nitrogen (N) is an essential macronutrient in the grapevine and is one of the most limiting nutrients for plant growth and development.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Expression of key enzymes for nitrogen assimilation in grapevine rootstock in response to N‐form and timing

Lang

Bárdos

Merkt

et al. 2019

J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aims: Rootstocks play an essential role in grapevine scion growth and development. They influence water and nutrient uptake and affect biomass allocation of the scion and the grape berry composition connected with wine quality. Nitrogen (N) can be taken up by the roots in various forms such as nitrate, ammonium or urea. These N-forms and their possible differential assimilation directly and indirectly influence grapevine vegetative and generative growth. N assimilation is driven by N acquiring enzymes such as nitrate reductase (NR), nitrite reductase (NiR) and glutamine synthetase (GS). This assimilation physiology can be influenced by factors such as light conditions or substrate availability. Methods: Hydroponically grown grapevine rootstocks were fertilized with various N-forms, namely calcium nitrate (CaN), ammonium (AM), urea (UR), and glutamine (Gln). The transcript expression of the enzymes NR, NiR and GS and the enzymatic nitrate reductase activity (eNRA) were examined at various time points (0 h, 3 h, and 6 h) after N application. Results and Conclusion: The data suggest that the grapevine rootstock SO4 has the ability to assimilate the amino acid Gln. Furthermore, AM, UR, and in some organs Gln, can regulate the co-enzymes NR and NiR, both of which function as activators of the NO À 3 assimilation process. The eNRA is clearly defined by the plant organ.

show abstract

The influence of grapevine rootstocks on scion growth and drought resistance

Cited by 110 publications

References 102 publications

Rootstocks for the new seedless table grape ‘BRS Vitória’ under tropical semi-arid conditions of São Francisco Valley

Rootstocks for the new seedless table grape ‘BRS Vitória’ under tropical semi-arid conditions of São Francisco Valley

Adapting plant material to face water stress in vineyards: which physiological targets for an optimal control of plant water status?

Expression of key enzymes for nitrogen assimilation in grapevine rootstock in response to N‐form and timing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About