1983
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(83)90176-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of hydrostatic pressure on the flow stress and ductility of a spherodized 1045 steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in most materials, experimental study of the different stages of the ductile factors such as shape, orientation [8,9,10] or spacing between fracture process. The local approach of fracture was used particles, [11] are randomly distributed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in most materials, experimental study of the different stages of the ductile factors such as shape, orientation [8,9,10] or spacing between fracture process. The local approach of fracture was used particles, [11] are randomly distributed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since such factors in the present work. This method was largely described on modify the incompatibility stress, nucleation becomes a consteels, aluminium, and titanium alloys [3][4][5]8,9,20,21] and permits tinuous process and more complicated to predict. To describe correlation between the mechanical parameters and the such a phenomenon, some authors [11,12] have discussed the induced damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They observed that after onset of damage homogeneous void growth occurred in tension specimens and the average void growth factor was quite similar for all tested specimens. Experiments performed by Brownrigg et al (1983) have shown the dominant effect of hydrostatic tensile stress on growth of voids. Thus, damage criteria which correspond to this kind of evolution of microdefects should take into account a term depending on the first stress invariant which may be seen as the dominating factor regulating the rate of nucleation and isotropic growth of voids.…”
Section: Damage Criterion and Damage Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nucleation and coalescence phases are negligible compared to the growth phase, and therefore are not taken into account in this model. Many authors [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] have shown the important role played by the hydrostatic stress. Therefore, it is expected that this component will appear in the damage function.…”
Section: Damage Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%